Open Access
March 2015 Bayesian Structure Learning in Sparse Gaussian Graphical Models
A. Mohammadi, E. C. Wit
Bayesian Anal. 10(1): 109-138 (March 2015). DOI: 10.1214/14-BA889

Abstract

Decoding complex relationships among large numbers of variables with relatively few observations is one of the crucial issues in science. One approach to this problem is Gaussian graphical modeling, which describes conditional independence of variables through the presence or absence of edges in the underlying graph. In this paper, we introduce a novel and efficient Bayesian framework for Gaussian graphical model determination which is a trans-dimensional Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach based on a continuous-time birth-death process. We cover the theory and computational details of the method. It is easy to implement and computationally feasible for high-dimensional graphs. We show our method outperforms alternative Bayesian approaches in terms of convergence, mixing in the graph space and computing time. Unlike frequentist approaches, it gives a principled and, in practice, sensible approach for structure learning. We illustrate the efficiency of the method on a broad range of simulated data. We then apply the method on large-scale real applications from human and mammary gland gene expression studies to show its empirical usefulness. In addition, we implemented the method in the R package BDgraph which is freely available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BDgraph.

Citation

Download Citation

A. Mohammadi. E. C. Wit. "Bayesian Structure Learning in Sparse Gaussian Graphical Models." Bayesian Anal. 10 (1) 109 - 138, March 2015. https://doi.org/10.1214/14-BA889

Information

Published: March 2015
First available in Project Euclid: 28 January 2015

zbMATH: 1335.62056
MathSciNet: MR3420899
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/14-BA889

Keywords: Bayesian model selection , birth-death process , G-Wishart , Markov chain Monte Carlo , non-decomposable graphs , Sparse Gaussian graphical models

Rights: Copyright © 2015 International Society for Bayesian Analysis

Vol.10 • No. 1 • March 2015
Back to Top