Abstract
There is a question attributed to Irving Kaplansky concerning the solvability of the quadratic equation in the case that the prime . This question was answered in the affirmative by Mollin [1], although according to [3], this result is implicit in the work of Gauss and Legendre. The proof appearing in [1] was later simplified in [4], and it was also shown therein that Kaplansky’s question was a special case of a more general result. Using the method of proof in [4], Mollin [2] has recently extended the results of [4], but upon further consideration, it appears that there is a more general phenomenon occurring, and also, that one of the assumptions in the main theorem of [2] is unnecessary. In this paper we prove this generalization, and eliminate one of the assumptions stated in the main result of [2]. The proof is again based on the method described in [4].
Acknowledgement
The author gratefully acknowledges support for his research from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Dedication
This paper is dedicated to the memory of Professor Irving Kaplansky
Citation
P.G. Walsh. "ON A QUESTION OF KAPLANSKY II." Albanian J. Math. 2 (1) 3 - 6, 2008. https://doi.org/10.51286/albjm/1204784496
Information