Journal of Applied Mathematics

A Comparative Holistic Fuzzy Approach for Evaluation of the Chain Performance of Suppliers

Ergün Eraslan and Kumru Didem Atalay

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

The competition between the companies in the dynamic market conditions has made the Supply Chain Management (SCM) a more important issue. The companies which have organized their supply chain effectively have obtained more flexibility in their manufacturing processes in addition to delivery of the customer demands. In this study, two different multicriteria decision making algorithms composed of the FAHP and a holistic hybrid method using FTOPSIS were utilized for an electronic company in wholly fuzzy processes. The FAHP is used for determination of the global weights of the factors and the performances of alternative suppliers are evaluated by using both FAHP-based and FAHP-FTOPSIS hybrid methods for synthetic extent values of pairwise comparisons. The sequences of the suppliers differed for the algorithms. The performances of the proposed approaches are quite successful and flexible in a narrow interval. The managerial advantages obtained from the proposed fuzzy algorithms are also analyzed and interpreted.

Article information

Source
J. Appl. Math., Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 109821, 9 pages.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 2 March 2015

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jam/1425305898

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1155/2014/109821

Citation

Eraslan, Ergün; Atalay, Kumru Didem. A Comparative Holistic Fuzzy Approach for Evaluation of the Chain Performance of Suppliers. J. Appl. Math. 2014 (2014), Article ID 109821, 9 pages. doi:10.1155/2014/109821. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jam/1425305898


Export citation

References

  • R. Ganeshan and T. P. Harrison, “An introduction to supply chain management,” 2003, http://lcm.csa.iisc.ernet.in/scm/ supply_chain_intro.html.
  • L. M. Ellram, “Supply chain management: the industrial organization perspective,” International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 1991.
  • C. A. Miller, The nature and design of supply chain performance measurement systems-an empirical study [Ph.D. thesis], The Pysillyvania State University, 2001.
  • S. Holmberg, Measurement on an integrated supply chain [Ph.D. thesis], Lund University, 1997.
  • R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business Scholl Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 1996.
  • P. C. Brewer and T. W. Speh, “Using the balanced scorecard to measure supply chain performance,” Journal of Business Logistics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 75–94, 2000.
  • J. L. Matthew and T. Milller, “A framework for integrating activity-based costing and the balanced scorecard into the logistics strategy development and monitoring process,” Journal of Business Logistics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 131–154, 1998.
  • F. T. S. Chan, “Performance measurement in a supply chain,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 534–548, 2003.
  • C. Wei, G. Liang, and M. J. Wang, “A comprehensive supply chain management project selection framework under fuzzy environment,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 627–636, 2007.
  • A. F. Guneri, A. Yucel, and G. Ayyildiz, “An integrated fuzzy-lp approach for a supplier selection problem in supply chain management,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 9223–9228, 2009.
  • L. Napalkova and G. Merkuryeva, “Multi-objective stochastic simulation-based optimisation applied to supply chain planning,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 132–148, 2012.
  • Y. Chen, C. Chen, and C. Lai, “Extracting performance rules of suppliers in the manufacturing industry: an empirical study,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2037–2045, 2012.
  • Z. H. Che, T. Chiang, and Z. Che, “Using analytic network process and turbo particle swarm optimization algorithm for non-balanced supply chain planning considering supplier relationship management,” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 720–735, 2012.
  • B. D. Rouyendegh and T. E. Erkan, “Selection the best supplier using AHP method,” African Journal of Business Management, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1454–1462, 2012.
  • F. Torfi, R. Z. Farahani, and S. Rezapour, “Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 520–528, 2010.
  • G. Bojadziev and M. Bojadziev, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic Applications, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 1998.
  • L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Computation, vol. 8, pp. 338–353, 1965.
  • P. J. M. van Laarhoven and W. Pedrycz, “A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 229–241, 1983.
  • J. J. Buckley, “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 233–247, 1985.
  • D. Chang, “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 649–655, 1996.
  • C. H. Cheng, “Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 343–350, 1997.
  • K. Zhu, Y. Jing, and D. Chang, “Discussion on extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 450–456, 1999.
  • O. Kulak and C. Kahraman, “Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process,” Information Sciences, vol. 170, no. 2–4, pp. 191–210, 2005.
  • O. Durán and J. Aguilo, “Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy-AHP approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1787–1794, 2008.
  • S. Önüt, T. Efendigil, and S. S. Kara, “A combined fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting shopping center site: an example from Istanbul, Turkey,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1973–1980, 2010.
  • X. Deng, Y. Hu, Y. Deng, and S. Mahadevan, “Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, pp. 156–167, 2014.
  • K. Zhü, “Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: fallacy of the popular methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 236, no. 1, pp. 209–217, 2014.
  • S. Chen and C. Hwang, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1992.
  • T. Chu and Y. Lin, “An interval arithmetic based fuzzy TOPSIS model,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 10870–10876, 2009.
  • B. D. Rouyendegh, “Evaluating projects based on intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2012, Article ID 824265, 16 pages, 2012.
  • S. Chen, “Evaluating weapon systems using fuzzy arithmetic operations,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 265–276, 1996.
  • C. T. Chen, C. T. Lin, and S. F. Huang, “A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 289–301, 2006.
  • S. Önüt and S. Soner, “Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment,” Waste Management, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1552–1559, 2008.
  • T. Wang and T. Chang, “Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 870–880, 2007.
  • H. J. Zimmerman, Fuzzy Sets Theory and Its Applications, Kluwer Academic, Boston, Mass, USA, 1996.
  • D. Y. Chang, “Extent analysis and synthetic decision,” in Optimization Techniques and Applications, vol. 1, World Scientific Publishers, Singapore, 1992.
  • C. Kahraman, T. Erbay, and G. Büyüközkan, “A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 171, no. 2, pp. 390–411, 2006. \endinput