Translator Disclaimer
November 2017 Contemporary Frequentist Views of the $2\times2$ Binomial Trial
Enrico Ripamonti, Chris Lloyd, Piero Quatto
Statist. Sci. 32(4): 600-615 (November 2017). DOI: 10.1214/17-STS627

Abstract

The $2\times2$ table is the simplest of data structures yet it is of immense practical importance. It is also just complex enough to provide a theoretical testing ground for general frequentist methods. Yet after 70 years of debate, its correct analysis is still not settled. Rather than recount the entire history, our review is motivated by contemporary developments in likelihood and testing theory as well as computational advances. We will look at both conditional and unconditional tests. Within the conditional framework, we explain the relationship of Fisher’s test with variants such as mid-$p$ and Liebermeister’s test, as well as modern developments in likelihood theory, such as $p^{*}$ and approximate conditioning. Within an unconditional framework, we consider four modern methods of correcting approximate tests to properly control size by accounting for the unknown value of the nuisance parameter: maximisation (M), partial maximisation (B), estimation (E) and estimation followed by maximisation ($\mbox{E}+\mbox{M}$). Under the conditional model, we recommend Fisher’s test. For the unconditional model, amongst standard approximate methods, Liebermeister’s tests come closest to controlling size. However, our best recommendation is the E procedure applied to the signed root likelihood statistic, as this performs very well in terms of size and power and is easily computed. We support our assertions with a numerical study.

Citation

Download Citation

Enrico Ripamonti. Chris Lloyd. Piero Quatto. "Contemporary Frequentist Views of the $2\times2$ Binomial Trial." Statist. Sci. 32 (4) 600 - 615, November 2017. https://doi.org/10.1214/17-STS627

Information

Published: November 2017
First available in Project Euclid: 28 November 2017

zbMATH: 1384.62115
MathSciNet: MR3730524
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/17-STS627

Rights: Copyright © 2017 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

JOURNAL ARTICLE
16 PAGES


SHARE
Vol.32 • No. 4 • November 2017
Back to Top