Abstract
This paper suggests to take seriously the idea, proposed by Le Cun, that AI could be seen at “a new phase of the Enlightenment”. It proposes the idea that an education for democracy with AI is possible under two conditions which are a basic feature of an ethics by design of AI and the two faces of the same coin: the expansion and enrichment rather than restriction and impoverishment of humanity at an individual, generational and cultural level. First, AI should neither be designed, nor developed or used for deskilling humanity but rather designed, developed and used for the preservation and extension of human capacities. Second, AI should not promote any form of technological colonialismbut rather aim at preserving and extending cultural and intellectual diversity. If we fulfill these two important criteria, we can thus think about AI not in terms of alarming risks but rather in terms of a constructive future promoting themotto of the Enlightment: “dare to think” and thus enabling an education for democracy.
Other Languages
A translated version of this article is available in French, https://doi.org/10.69828/4d4kf7.
Acknowledgements
Vanessa Nurock is grateful to Yvonne van der Does of the Université Côte d’Azur Office of International Scientific Visibility (IdEx) for English language editing of the manuscript and to John Shawe-Taylor for some suggestions to helpme clarify the English version of this paper. This work was supported by the French government through the France 2030 investment plan managed by the National Research Agency (ANR), as part of the Initiative of Excellence of Université Côte d’Azur under reference number ANR-15-IDEX-0.
Citation
Vanessa Nurock. "“Dare to Think” Education for Democracy with AI." Journal of Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development 1 (1) EN3 - EN7, 2024. https://doi.org/10.69828/4d4kc4
Information