Open Access
2013 Comparison of models for $(\infty, n)$–categories, I
Julia E Bergner, Charles Rezk
Geom. Topol. 17(4): 2163-2202 (2013). DOI: 10.2140/gt.2013.17.2163

Abstract

While many different models for (,1)–categories are currently being used, it is known that they are Quillen equivalent to one another. Several higher-order analogues of them are being developed as models for (,n)–categories. In this paper, we establish model structures for some naturally arising categories of objects which should be thought of as (,n)–categories. Furthermore, we establish Quillen equivalences between them.

Citation

Download Citation

Julia E Bergner. Charles Rezk. "Comparison of models for $(\infty, n)$–categories, I." Geom. Topol. 17 (4) 2163 - 2202, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2140/gt.2013.17.2163

Information

Received: 17 April 2012; Revised: 18 March 2013; Accepted: 17 April 2013; Published: 2013
First available in Project Euclid: 20 December 2017

zbMATH: 1273.18031
MathSciNet: MR3109865
Digital Object Identifier: 10.2140/gt.2013.17.2163

Subjects:
Primary: 55U40
Secondary: 18C10 , 18D15 , 18D20 , 18G30 , 55U35

Keywords: $(\infty, n)$–categories , $\Theta_n$–spaces , Enriched categories

Rights: Copyright © 2013 Mathematical Sciences Publishers

Vol.17 • No. 4 • 2013
MSP
Back to Top