Open Access
2008 Tightness of voter model interfaces
Anja Sturm, Jan Swart
Author Affiliations +
Electron. Commun. Probab. 13: 165-174 (2008). DOI: 10.1214/ECP.v13-1360
Abstract

Consider a long-range, one-dimensional voter model started with all zeroes on the negative integers and all ones on the positive integers. If the process obtained by identifying states that are translations of each other is positively recurrent, then it is said that the voter model exhibits interface tightness. In 1995, Cox and Durrett proved that one-dimensional voter models exhibit interface tightness if their infection rates have a finite third moment. Recently, Belhaouari, Mountford, and Valle have improved this by showing that a finite second moment suffices. The present paper gives a new short proof of this fact. We also prove interface tightness for a long range swapping voter model, which has a mixture of long range voter model and exclusion process dynamics.

References

1.

V. Belitsky, P.A. Ferrari, M.V. Menshikov, and S.Y. Popov. A mixture of the exclusion process and the voter model. Bernoulli 7(1): 119–144, 2001. 0978.60105 10.2307/3318605 euclid.bj/1080572342V. Belitsky, P.A. Ferrari, M.V. Menshikov, and S.Y. Popov. A mixture of the exclusion process and the voter model. Bernoulli 7(1): 119–144, 2001. 0978.60105 10.2307/3318605 euclid.bj/1080572342

2.

S. Belhaouari, T. Mountford, R.Sun, and G. Valle. Convergence results and sharp estimates for the voter model interfaces. Electron. J. Probab. 11: Paper No. 30, 768–801, 2006. 1113.60092 10.1214/EJP.v11-349S. Belhaouari, T. Mountford, R.Sun, and G. Valle. Convergence results and sharp estimates for the voter model interfaces. Electron. J. Probab. 11: Paper No. 30, 768–801, 2006. 1113.60092 10.1214/EJP.v11-349

3.

S. Belhaouari, T. Mountford, and G. Valle. Tightness for the interfaces of one-dimensional voter models. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 94(2): 421–442, 2007. 1112.60074 10.1112/plms/pdl016S. Belhaouari, T. Mountford, and G. Valle. Tightness for the interfaces of one-dimensional voter models. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 94(2): 421–442, 2007. 1112.60074 10.1112/plms/pdl016

4.

J.T. Cox and R. Durrett. Hybrid zones and voter model interfaces. Bernoulli 1(4): 343–370, 1995. 0849.60088 10.2307/3318488 euclid.bj/1193758711J.T. Cox and R. Durrett. Hybrid zones and voter model interfaces. Bernoulli 1(4): 343–370, 1995. 0849.60088 10.2307/3318488 euclid.bj/1193758711

5.

S.J. Handjani. The complete convergence theorem for coexistent threshold voter models. Ann. Probab. 27(1): 226–245, 1999. MR1681118 0974.60093 10.1214/aop/1022677260 euclid.aop/1022677260S.J. Handjani. The complete convergence theorem for coexistent threshold voter models. Ann. Probab. 27(1): 226–245, 1999. MR1681118 0974.60093 10.1214/aop/1022677260 euclid.aop/1022677260

6.

T.M. Liggett. Interacting Particle Systems. Springer, New York, 1985. 0559.60078T.M. Liggett. Interacting Particle Systems. Springer, New York, 1985. 0559.60078

7.

A. Sturm and J.M. Swart. Voter models with heterozygosity selection. Ann. Appl. Probab 18(1): 59–99, 2008. 1139.82029 10.1214/07-AAP444 euclid.aoap/1199890015A. Sturm and J.M. Swart. Voter models with heterozygosity selection. Ann. Appl. Probab 18(1): 59–99, 2008. 1139.82029 10.1214/07-AAP444 euclid.aoap/1199890015
Anja Sturm and Jan Swart "Tightness of voter model interfaces," Electronic Communications in Probability 13(none), 165-174, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1214/ECP.v13-1360
Accepted: 8 April 2008; Published: 2008
Back to Top