September 2010 What does it take to prove Fermat's Last Theorem? Grothendieck and the logic of number theory
Colin McLarty
Bull. Symbolic Logic 16(3): 359-377 (September 2010). DOI: 10.2178/bsl/1286284558

Abstract

This paper explores the set theoretic assumptions used in the current published proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, how these assumptions figure in the methods Wiles uses, and the currently known prospects for a proof using weaker assumptions.

Citation

Download Citation

Colin McLarty. "What does it take to prove Fermat's Last Theorem? Grothendieck and the logic of number theory." Bull. Symbolic Logic 16 (3) 359 - 377, September 2010. https://doi.org/10.2178/bsl/1286284558

Information

Published: September 2010
First available in Project Euclid: 5 October 2010

zbMATH: 1210.03029
MathSciNet: MR2731249
Digital Object Identifier: 10.2178/bsl/1286284558

Rights: Copyright © 2010 Association for Symbolic Logic

JOURNAL ARTICLE
19 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

Vol.16 • No. 3 • September 2010
Back to Top