Translator Disclaimer
September 2007 Cluster allocation design networks
Ana Maria Madrigal
Bayesian Anal. 2(3): 557-589 (September 2007). DOI: 10.1214/07-BA222

Abstract

When planning and designing a policy intervention and evaluation, it is important to differentiate between (future) policy interventions we want to evaluate, $F_{T}$, affecting "the world," and experimental allocations, $A_{T}$, affecting "our picture of the world." The policy maker usually has to define a strategy that involves policy assignment and recording mechanisms that will affect the (conditional independence) structure of the data available. Causal inference is sensitive to the specification of these mechanisms. Influence diagrams have been used for causal reasoning within a Bayesian decision-theoretic framework that introduces interventions as decision nodes (Dawid 2002). Design Networks expand this framework by including experimental design decision nodes (Madrigal and Smith 2004). They provide semantics to discuss how a design decision strategy (such as a cluster randomised study) might assist the identification of intervention causal effects. The Design Network framework is extended to Cluster Allocation. It is used to assess identifiability when the experimental unit's level is different from the analysis unit's level, and to discuss the evaluation of cluster- and individual-level future policies. Cases of 'pure' cluster (all individuals in a cluster receiving the same intervention) and 'non-pure' cluster (only a subset receiving the policy) are discussed in terms of causal effects. The representation and analysis of a simplified version of a Mexican social policy programme to alleviate poverty (Progresa) is performed as an illustration of the use of Bayesian hierarchical models to make causal inferences relating to household and community level interventions.

Citation

Download Citation

Ana Maria Madrigal. "Cluster allocation design networks." Bayesian Anal. 2 (3) 557 - 589, September 2007. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-BA222

Information

Published: September 2007
First available in Project Euclid: 22 June 2012

zbMATH: 1331.62314
MathSciNet: MR2342175
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/07-BA222

Rights: Copyright © 2007 International Society for Bayesian Analysis

JOURNAL ARTICLE
33 PAGES


SHARE
Vol.2 • No. 3 • September 2007
Back to Top