Open Access
March, 1987 Is the Selected Population the Best?
Sam Gutmann, Zakhar Maymin
Ann. Statist. 15(1): 456-461 (March, 1987). DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176350281

Abstract

Random variables $X_i \sim N(\theta_i, 1), i = 1,2,\cdots, k$, are observed. Suppose $X_S$ is the largest observation. If the inference $\theta_S > \max_{i\neq S}\theta_i$ is made whenever $X_S - \max_{i\neq S}X_i > c$, then the probability of a false inference is maximized when two $\theta_i$ are equal and the rest are $-\infty$. Equivalently, the inference can be made whenever a two-sample two-sided test for difference of means, based on the largest two observations, would reject the hypothesis of no difference. The result also holds in the case of unknown, estimable, common variance, and in fact for location families with monotone likelihood ratio.

Citation

Download Citation

Sam Gutmann. Zakhar Maymin. "Is the Selected Population the Best?." Ann. Statist. 15 (1) 456 - 461, March, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176350281

Information

Published: March, 1987
First available in Project Euclid: 12 April 2007

zbMATH: 0623.62021
MathSciNet: MR885752
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/aos/1176350281

Subjects:
Primary: 62F03
Secondary: 62F07

Keywords: monotone likelihood ratio , retrospective hypotheses , selection

Rights: Copyright © 1987 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

Vol.15 • No. 1 • March, 1987
Back to Top