Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
March 2013 Incorporating external information in analyses of clinical trials with binary outcomes
Minge Xie, Regina Y. Liu, C. V. Damaraju, William H. Olson
Ann. Appl. Stat. 7(1): 342-368 (March 2013). DOI: 10.1214/12-AOAS585

Abstract

External information, such as prior information or expert opinions, can play an important role in the design, analysis and interpretation of clinical trials. However, little attention has been devoted thus far to incorporating external information in clinical trials with binary outcomes, perhaps due to the perception that binary outcomes can be treated as normally-distributed outcomes by using normal approximations. In this paper we show that these two types of clinical trials could behave differently, and that special care is needed for the analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes. In particular, we first examine a simple but commonly used univariate Bayesian approach and observe a technical flaw. We then study the full Bayesian approach using different beta priors and a new frequentist approach based on the notion of confidence distribution (CD). These approaches are illustrated and compared using data from clinical studies and simulations. The full Bayesian approach is theoretically sound, but surprisingly, under skewed prior distributions, the estimate derived from the marginal posterior distribution may not fall between those from the marginal prior and the likelihood of clinical trial data. This counterintuitive phenomenon, which we call the “discrepant posterior phenomenon,” does not occur in the CD approach. The CD approach is also computationally simpler and can be applied directly to any prior distribution, symmetric or skewed.

Citation

Download Citation

Minge Xie. Regina Y. Liu. C. V. Damaraju. William H. Olson. "Incorporating external information in analyses of clinical trials with binary outcomes." Ann. Appl. Stat. 7 (1) 342 - 368, March 2013. https://doi.org/10.1214/12-AOAS585

Information

Published: March 2013
First available in Project Euclid: 9 April 2013

zbMATH: 06171275
MathSciNet: MR3086422
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/12-AOAS585

Keywords: Bayesian method , combining information , confidence distribution , discrepant posterior , expert opinion , prior distribution , requentist method

Rights: Copyright © 2013 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

JOURNAL ARTICLE
27 PAGES


SHARE
Vol.7 • No. 1 • March 2013
Back to Top