Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
September 2008 A sharper discrepancy measure for post-election audits
Philip B. Stark
Ann. Appl. Stat. 2(3): 982-985 (September 2008). DOI: 10.1214/08-AOAS171

Abstract

Post-election audits use the discrepancy between machine counts and a hand tally of votes in a random sample of precincts to infer whether error affected the electoral outcome. The maximum relative overstatement of pairwise margins (MRO) quantifies that discrepancy. The electoral outcome a full hand tally shows must agree with the apparent outcome if the MRO is less than 1. This condition is sharper than previous ones when there are more than two candidates or when voters may vote for more than one candidate. For the 2006 U.S. Senate race in Minnesota, a test using MRO gives a P-value of 4.05% for the hypothesis that a full hand tally would find a different winner, less than half the value Stark [Ann. Appl. Statist. 2 (2008) 550–581] finds.

Citation

Download Citation

Philip B. Stark. "A sharper discrepancy measure for post-election audits." Ann. Appl. Stat. 2 (3) 982 - 985, September 2008. https://doi.org/10.1214/08-AOAS171

Information

Published: September 2008
First available in Project Euclid: 13 October 2008

zbMATH: 05377255
MathSciNet: MR2516800
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/08-AOAS171

Keywords: auditing , elections , error bounds in auditing

Rights: Copyright © 2008 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
Vol.2 • No. 3 • September 2008
Back to Top