Open Access
December 2016 Estimating odds ratios under a case-background design with an application to a study of Sorafenib accessibility
John H. Spivack, Bin Cheng
Ann. Appl. Stat. 10(4): 2233-2253 (December 2016). DOI: 10.1214/16-AOAS972

Abstract

In certain epidemiologic studies such as those involving stress disorders, sexual harassment, alcohol addiction or epidemiological criminology, exposure data are readily available from cases but not from controls because it is socially inconvenient or even unethical to determine who qualifies as a true control subject. Consequently, it is impractical or even infeasible to use a case-control design to establish the case-exposure association in such situations. To address this issue, we propose a case-background design where in addition to a sample of exposure information from cases, an independent sample of exposure information from the background population is taken, without knowing the case status of the sampled subjects. We develop a semiparametric method to estimate the odds ratio and show that the estimator is strongly consistent and asymptotically normally distributed. Simulation studies indicate that the estimators perform satisfactorily in finite samples and against violations of assumptions. The proposed method is applied to a Sorafenib accessibility study of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Citation

Download Citation

John H. Spivack. Bin Cheng. "Estimating odds ratios under a case-background design with an application to a study of Sorafenib accessibility." Ann. Appl. Stat. 10 (4) 2233 - 2253, December 2016. https://doi.org/10.1214/16-AOAS972

Information

Received: 1 November 2015; Revised: 1 August 2016; Published: December 2016
First available in Project Euclid: 5 January 2017

zbMATH: 06688775
MathSciNet: MR3592055
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/16-AOAS972

Keywords: case-exposure association , Case-only design , criminological epidemiology , disease registry , imputation , pseudo-likelihood

Rights: Copyright © 2016 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

Vol.10 • No. 4 • December 2016
Back to Top