Journal of Applied Mathematics

Comparison of Neural Network Error Measures for Simulation of Slender Marine Structures

Niels H. Christiansen, Per Erlend Torbergsen Voie, Ole Winther, and Jan Høgsberg

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text


Training of an artificial neural network (ANN) adjusts the internal weights of the network in order to minimize a predefined error measure. This error measure is given by an error function. Several different error functions are suggested in the literature. However, the far most common measure for regression is the mean square error. This paper looks into the possibility of improving the performance of neural networks by selecting or defining error functions that are tailor-made for a specific objective. A neural network trained to simulate tension forces in an anchor chain on a floating offshore platform is designed and tested. The purpose of setting up the network is to reduce calculation time in a fatigue life analysis. Therefore, the networks trained on different error functions are compared with respect to accuracy of rain flow counts of stress cycles over a number of time series simulations. It is shown that adjusting the error function to perform significantly better on a specific problem is possible. On the other hand. it is also shown that weighted error functions actually can impair the performance of an ANN.

Article information

J. Appl. Math., Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 759834, 11 pages.

First available in Project Euclid: 2 March 2015

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier


Christiansen, Niels H.; Voie, Per Erlend Torbergsen; Winther, Ole; Høgsberg, Jan. Comparison of Neural Network Error Measures for Simulation of Slender Marine Structures. J. Appl. Math. 2014 (2014), Article ID 759834, 11 pages. doi:10.1155/2014/759834.

Export citation


  • DNV, “Offshore Standard DNV-OS-F201–-Dynamic Risers,” Det Norske Veritas, October 2010.
  • DNV, “Recommended Practice DNV-RP-F204–-Riser Fatigue,” Det Norske Veritas, July 2005.
  • M. H. Patel and F. B. Seyed, “Review of flexible riser modelling and analysis techniques,” Engineering Structures, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 293–304, 1995.
  • H. Adeli, “Neural networks in civil engineering: 1989–2000,” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 126–142, 2001.
  • B. Warner and M. Misra, “Understanding neural networks as statistical tools,” The American Statistician, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 284–293, 1996.
  • K. Ordaz-Hernandez, X. Fischer, and F. Bennis, “Model reduction technique for mechanical behaviour modelling: efficiency criteria and validity domain assessment,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, vol. 222, no. 3, pp. 493–505, 2008.
  • M. Hosseini and H. Abbas, “Neural network approach for prediction of deflection of clamped beams struck by a mass,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 60, pp. 222–228, 2012.
  • R. Guarize, N. A. F. Matos, L. V. S. Sagrilo, and E. C. P. Lima, “Neural networks in the dynamic response analysis of slender marine structures,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 191–198, 2007.
  • N. H. Christiansen, P. E. T. Voie, J. Høgsberg, and N. Sødahl, “Efficient mooring line fatigue analysis using a hybrid method time domain simulation scheme,” in Proceedings of the 32nd ASME International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE '13), vol. 1, 2013.
  • S. A. Solla, E. Levin, and M. Fleisher, “Accelerated learning in layered neural networks,” Complex Systems, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 625–639, 1988.
  • J. B. Hampshire and A. H. Waibel, “Novel objective function for improved phoneme recognition using time-delay neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 216–228, 1990.
  • H. Altincay and M. Demirekler, “Comparison of different objective functions for optimal linear combination of classifiers for speaker identification,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '01), vol. 1, pp. 401–404, May 2001.
  • MARINTEK, Simo Theory Manual, Sintef, Trondheim, Norway, 2009.
  • MARINTE, Riflex Theory Manual, Sintef, Trondheim, Norway, 2008.
  • C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2006.
  • C. M. Bishop, Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, The Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1995.
  • R. Fletcher, Practical Methods of Optimization, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2nd edition, 1987. \endinput