- Bayesian Anal.
- Volume 1, Number 3 (2006), 423-428.
Coherence and calibration: comments on subjectivity and "objectivity'' in Bayesian analysis (comment on articles by Berger and by Goldstein)
In this contribution to the discussion of "The case for objective Bayesian analysis" by James Berger and "Subjective Bayesian analysis: principles and practice" by Michael Goldstein, I argue that (a) all Bayesian work is inherently subjective and needs to be guided simultaneously by considerations of both coherence and calibration, and (b) "objective" (diffuse) prior distributions are sometimes, but not always, useful in attaining good calibrative performance---it depends (as usual) on your judgment about how knowns (e.g., past observables) and unknowns (e.g., future observables) are related.
Bayesian Anal. Volume 1, Number 3 (2006), 423-428.
First available in Project Euclid: 22 June 2012
Permanent link to this document
Digital Object Identifier
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
Zentralblatt MATH identifier
Draper, David. Coherence and calibration: comments on subjectivity and "objectivity'' in Bayesian analysis (comment on articles by Berger and by Goldstein). Bayesian Anal. 1 (2006), no. 3, 423--428. doi:10.1214/06-BA116B. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ba/1340371038
- Related item: James Berger. The case for objective Bayesian analysis. Bayesian Anal., Vol. 1, Iss. 3 (2006), 385-402.
- Related item: Michael Goldstein. Subjective Bayesian Analysis: Principles and Practice. Bayesian Anal., Vol. 1, Iss. 3 (2006), 403-420.