The Annals of Applied Statistics

Joint significance tests for mediation effects of socioeconomic adversity on adiposity via epigenetics

Yen-Tsung Huang

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

Mediation analysis has become a popular practice in biomedical research. We conduct mediation analyses to investigate whether epigenetic variations mediate the effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on adiposity. Mediation effects can be expressed as a product of two parameters: one for the exposure-mediator association and the other for the mediator-outcome association conditional on the exposure. Under multi-mediator models, we study joint significance tests which examine the two parameters separately and compare with the widely used product significance tests which focus on the product of two parameters. Normal approximation of product significance tests depends on both effect size and sample size. We show that joint significance tests are intersection-union tests with size $\alpha$ and asymptotically more powerful than the normality-based product significance tests. Based on the theoretical results, we construct powerful testing procedures for gene-based mediation analyses and path-specific analyses. Advantage of joint significance tests is supported by simulation as well as the results of locus-based and gene-based mediation analyses of chromosome 17. Our analyses suggest that methylation of FASN gene mediates the effect of socioeconomic adversity on adiposity.

Article information

Source
Ann. Appl. Stat., Volume 12, Number 3 (2018), 1535-1557.

Dates
Received: January 2017
Revised: October 2017
First available in Project Euclid: 11 September 2018

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1536652964

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/17-AOAS1120

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR3852687

Keywords
Intersection-union test joint significance test mediation analyses multivariate analyses normal product distribution path-specific effect

Citation

Huang, Yen-Tsung. Joint significance tests for mediation effects of socioeconomic adversity on adiposity via epigenetics. Ann. Appl. Stat. 12 (2018), no. 3, 1535--1557. doi:10.1214/17-AOAS1120. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1536652964


Export citation

References

  • Agha, G., Houseman, E. A., Kelsey, K. T., Eaton, C. B., Buka, S. L. and Loucks, E. B. (2015). Adiposity is associated with DNA methylation profile in adipose tissue. Int. J. Epidemiol. 44 1277–1287.
  • Albert, J. M. and Nelson, S. (2011). Generalized causal mediation analysis. Biometrics 67 1028–1038.
  • Aroian, L. A. (1947). The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables. Ann. Math. Stat. 18 265–271.
  • Avin, C., Shpitser, I. and Pearl, J. (2005). Identifiability of path-specific effects. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence 357–363.
  • Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51 1173–1182.
  • Berger, R. L. and Hsu, J. C. (1996). Bioequivalence trials, intersection-union tests and equivalence confidence sets. Statist. Sci. 11 283–319.
  • Bollen, K. A. and Stine, R. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociol. Method. 20 115–140.
  • Borghol, N., Suderman, M., McArdle, W., Racine, A., Hallett, M., Pembrey, M., Hertzman, C., Power, C. and Szyf, M. (2012). Associations with early-life socioeconomic position in adult DNA methylation. Int. J. Epidemiol. 41 62–74.
  • Darmon, N. and Drewnowski, A. (2008). Does social class predict diet quality? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 87 1107–1117.
  • Davis, S., Du, P., Bilke, S., Triche, T. J. and Bootwalla, M. (2015). methylumi: Handle Illumina methylation data. R package version 2.14.0.
  • Giskes, K., Avendano, M., Brug, J. and Kunst, A. E. (2010). A systematic review of studies on socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intakes associated with weight gain and overweight/obesity conducted among European adults. Obes. Rev. 11 413–429.
  • Hardy, J. B. (1971). The Johns Hopkins collaborative perinatal project. Descriptive background. Johns Hopkins Med. J. 128 238–243.
  • Huang, Y.-T. (2018). Supplement to “Joint significance tests for mediation effects of socioeconomic adversity on adiposity via epigenetics.” DOI:10.1214/17-AOAS1120SUPP.
  • Huang, Y.-T. and Cai, T. (2016). Mediation analysis for survival data using semiparametric probit models. Biometrics 72 563–574.
  • Huang, Y.-T. and Pan, W.-C. (2016). Hypothesis test of mediation effect in causal mediation model with high-dimensional continuous mediators. Biometrics 72 401–413.
  • Huang, Y. T., Chu, S., Loucks, E. B., Lin, C. L., Eaton, C. B., Buka, S. L. and Kelsey, K. T. (2016). Epigenome-wide profiling of DNA methylation in paired samples of adipose tissue and blood. Epigenetics 11 227–236.
  • Imai, K., Keele, L. and Yamamoto, T. (2010). Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statist. Sci. 25 51–71.
  • Kadota, Y., Kawakami, T., Takasaki, S., Sato, M. and Suzuki, S. (2016). Gene expression related to lipid and glucose metabolism in white adipose tissue. Obes. Res. Clin. Pract. 10 85–93.
  • Kovacs, P., Harper, I., Hanson, R. I., Infante, A. M., Bogardus, C., Tataranni, P. A. and Baier, L. J. (2004). A novel missense substitution (Val1483Ile) in the fatty acid synthase gene (FAS) is associated with percentage of body fat and substrate oxidation rates in nondiabetic Pima Indians. Diabetes 53 1915–1919.
  • Lange, T. and Hansen, J. V. (2011). Direct and indirect effects in a survival context. Epidemiology 22 575–581.
  • Loftus, T. M., Jaworsky, D. E., Frehywot, G. L., Townsend, C. A., Ronnett, G. V., Lane, M. D. and Kuhajda, F. P. (2000). Reduced food intake and body weight in mice treated with fatty acid synthase inhibitors. Science 288 2379–2381.
  • Loucks, E. B., Huang, Y. T., Agha, G., Chu, S., Eaton, C. B., Gilman, S. E., Buka, S. L. and Kelsey, K. T. (2016). Epigenetic mediators between childhood socioeconomic disadvantage and mid-life body mass index: The New England Family Study. Psychosom. Med. 78 1053–1065.
  • MacKinnon, D. (2008). Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. Taylor & Francis, London.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G. and Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol. Methods 7 83–104.
  • Pearl, J. (2001). Direct and indirect effects. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty and Artificial Intelligence 411–420. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
  • Preacher, K. J. and Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40 879–891.
  • Robins, J. M. (2003). Semantics of Causal DAG Models and the Identification of Direct and Indirect Effects. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
  • Robins, J. M. and Greenland, S. (1992). Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology 3 143–155.
  • Rubin, D. B. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. Ann. Statist. 6 34–58.
  • Senese, L. C., Almeida, N. D., Fath, A. K., Smith, B. T. and Loucks, E. B. (2009). Associations between childhood socioeconomic position and adulthood obesity. Epidemiol. Rev. 31 21–51.
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models. American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.
  • Taylor, A. B., MacKinnon, D. P. and Tein, J.-Y. (2008). Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organ. Res. Methods 11 241–269.
  • Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J. (2011). On causal mediation analysis with a survival outcome. Int. J. Biostat. 7 Article 33.
  • Teschendorff, A. E., Marabita, F., Lechner, M., Bartlett, T., Tegner, J., Gomez-Cabrero, D. and Beck, S. (2013). A beta-mixture quantile normalization method for correcting probe design bias in Illumina Infinium 450 k DNA methylation data. Bioinformatics 29 189–196.
  • VanderWeele, T. J. (2011). Causal mediation analysis with survival data. Epidemiology 22 582–585.
  • VanderWeele, T. J. and Vansteelandt, S. (2009). Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and composition. Stat. Interface 2 457–468.
  • VanderWeele, T. J. and Vansteelandt, S. (2010). Odds ratios for mediation analysis for a dichotomous outcome. Am. J. Epidemiol. 172 1339–1348.
  • VanderWeele, T. J. and Vansteelandt, S. (2013). Mediation analysis with multiple mediators. Epidemiol. Methods 2 95–115.
  • Wu, M., Kraft, P., Epstein, M., Taylor, D., Chanock, S., Hunter, D. J. and Lin, X. (2010). Powerful SNP set analysis for case-control genomewide association studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 86 929–942.

Supplemental materials

  • Supplement to “Joint significance tests for mediation effects of socioeconomic adversity on adiposity via epigenetics”. Supplementary material includes discussion of causal assumptions, additional simulation studies, and PSE analyses of 26 methylation loci of FASN.