Translator Disclaimer
August, 1988 Scientific Origins of Incompatibility in Risk Assessment
Paul D. Anderson
Statist. Sci. 3(3): 320-327 (August, 1988). DOI: 10.1214/ss/1177012833

Abstract

A comparison of the carcinogenic potency estimates for many chemicals reveals that different governmental agencies derive and use alternative estimates of a chemical's carcinogenic potency. This paper examines which steps in the process of deriving carcinogenic potency estimates (e.g., high to low dose extrapolation, bioassay choice, data set treatment, etc.) contribute to the differences within and between governmental agencies by comparing the details of the process of potency estimation for four chemicals (ethylene dibromide, polychlorinated biphenyls, tetrachloroethylene and tetrachlorodibenzo-$p$-dioxin). For three of these four chemicals all agencies used similar high to low dose extrapolation models and most of the incompatibility arose from selection and treatment of bioassay results. The comparison suggests that an inverse relationship exists between the potential contribution of a parameter to incompatibility and its actual contribution; the existing incompatibility between agencies represented by existing differences in potency estimates is dwarfed by potential incompatibility; and, some but not all, of the incompatibility can be reduced.

Citation

Download Citation

Paul D. Anderson. "Scientific Origins of Incompatibility in Risk Assessment." Statist. Sci. 3 (3) 320 - 327, August, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177012833

Information

Published: August, 1988
First available in Project Euclid: 19 April 2007

Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/ss/1177012833

Rights: Copyright © 1988 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
Vol.3 • No. 3 • August, 1988
Back to Top