Translator Disclaimer
November 2010 A Statistical Model to Explain the Mendel–Fisher Controversy
Ana M. Pires, João A. Branco
Statist. Sci. 25(4): 545-565 (November 2010). DOI: 10.1214/10-STS342

Abstract

In 1866 Gregor Mendel published a seminal paper containing the foundations of modern genetics. In 1936 Ronald Fisher published a statistical analysis of Mendel’s data concluding that “the data of most, if not all, of the experiments have been falsified so as to agree closely with Mendel’s expectations.” The accusation gave rise to a controversy which has reached the present time. There are reasonable grounds to assume that a certain unconscious bias was systematically introduced in Mendel’s experimentation. Based on this assumption, a probability model that fits Mendel’s data and does not offend Fisher’s analysis is given. This reconciliation model may well be the end of the Mendel–Fisher controversy.

Citation

Download Citation

Ana M. Pires. João A. Branco. "A Statistical Model to Explain the Mendel–Fisher Controversy." Statist. Sci. 25 (4) 545 - 565, November 2010. https://doi.org/10.1214/10-STS342

Information

Published: November 2010
First available in Project Euclid: 14 March 2011

zbMATH: 1329.62094
MathSciNet: MR2807770
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/10-STS342

Rights: Copyright © 2010 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

JOURNAL ARTICLE
21 PAGES


SHARE
Vol.25 • No. 4 • November 2010
Back to Top