Open Access
November 2002 Why does voting get so complicated? A review of theories for analyzing democratic participation
Jason Gainous, Jeff Gill
Statist. Sci. 17(4): 383-404 (November 2002). DOI: 10.1214/ss/1049993199


The purpose of this article is to present a sample from the panoply of formal theories on voting and elections to Statistical Science readers who have had limited exposure to such work. These abstract ideas provide a framework for understanding the context of the empirical articles that follow in this volume. The primary focus of this theoretical literature is on the use of mathematical formalism to describe electoral systems and outcomes by modeling both voting rules and human behavior. As with empirical models, these constructs are never perfect descriptors of reality, but instead form the basis for understanding fundamental characteristics of the studied system. Our focus is on providing a general, but not overly simplified, review of these theories with practical examples. We end the article with a thought experiment that applies different vote aggregation schemes to the 2000 presidential election count in Florida, and we find that alternative methods provide different results.


Download Citation

Jason Gainous. Jeff Gill. "Why does voting get so complicated? A review of theories for analyzing democratic participation." Statist. Sci. 17 (4) 383 - 404, November 2002.


Published: November 2002
First available in Project Euclid: 10 April 2003

zbMATH: 1062.91535
MathSciNet: MR1977135
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/ss/1049993199

Keywords: cost-benefit models , elections , Florida 2000 election , participation , rational choice , Spatial models , Voting rules

Rights: Copyright © 2002 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

Vol.17 • No. 4 • November 2002
Back to Top