Open Access
2009 I : An Intuitionistic Logic without Fregean Axiom and with Predicates for Truth and Falsity
Steffen Lewitzka
Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 50(3): 275-301 (2009). DOI: 10.1215/00294527-2009-012

Abstract

We present I -Logic (Epsilon-I-Logic), a non-Fregean intuitionistic logic with a truth predicate and a falsity predicate as intuitionistic negation. I is an extension and intuitionistic generalization of the classical logic T (without quantifiers) designed by Sträter as a theory of truth with propositional self-reference. The intensional semantics of T offers a new solution to semantic paradoxes. In the present paper we introduce an intuitionistic semantics and study some semantic notions in this broader context. Also we enrich the quantifier-free language by the new connective < that expresses reference between statements and yields a finer characterization of intensional models. Our results in the intuitionistic setting lead to a clear distinction between the notion of denotation of a sentence and the here-proposed notion of extension of a sentence (both concepts are equivalent in the classical context). We generalize the Fregean Axiom to an intuitionistic version not valid in I . A main result of the paper is the development of several model constructions. We construct intensional models and present a method for the construction of standard models which contain specific (self-)referential propositions.

Citation

Download Citation

Steffen Lewitzka. " I : An Intuitionistic Logic without Fregean Axiom and with Predicates for Truth and Falsity." Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 50 (3) 275 - 301, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1215/00294527-2009-012

Information

Published: 2009
First available in Project Euclid: 10 November 2009

zbMATH: 1190.03016
MathSciNet: MR2572975
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1215/00294527-2009-012

Subjects:
Primary: 03B20 , 03B60
Secondary: 03B65

Keywords: denotation , Extension‎ , intension , intensional semantics , Intuitionistic logic , non-Fregean logics , Self-reference , semantic paradoxes , truth theory

Rights: Copyright © 2009 University of Notre Dame

Vol.50 • No. 3 • 2009
Back to Top