Translator Disclaimer
Winter 1999 Logic, Logics, and Logicism
Solomon Feferman
Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 40(1): 31-54 (Winter 1999). DOI: 10.1305/ndjfl/1039096304


The paper starts with an examination and critique of Tarski's well-known proposed explication of the notion of logical operation in the type structure over a given domain of individuals as one which is invariant with respect to arbitrary permutations of the domain. The class of such operations has been characterized by McGee as exactly those definable in the language ${\cal L}_{\infty,\infty}$. Also characterized similarly is a natural generalization of Tarski's thesis, due to Sher, in terms of bijections between domains. My main objections are that on the one hand, the Tarski-Sher thesis thus assimilates logic to mathematics, and on the other hand fails to explain the notion of same logical operation across domains of different sizes. A new notion of homomorphism invariant operation over functional type structures (with domains $M_0$ of individuals and $\{T,F\}$ at their base) is introduced to accomplish the latter. The main result is that an operation is definable from the first-order predicate calculus without equality just in case it is definable from homomorphism invariant monadic operations, where definability in both cases is taken in the sense of the $\lambda$-calculus. The paper concludes with a discussion of the significance of the results described for the views of Tarski and Boolos on logicism.


Download Citation

Solomon Feferman. "Logic, Logics, and Logicism." Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 40 (1) 31 - 54, Winter 1999.


Published: Winter 1999
First available in Project Euclid: 5 December 2002

zbMATH: 0972.03005
MathSciNet: MR1811202
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1305/ndjfl/1039096304

Primary: 03A05
Secondary: 03B10, 03C80

Rights: Copyright © 1999 University of Notre Dame


Vol.40 • No. 1 • Winter 1999
Back to Top