Open Access
October 1993 Peirce and Frege, a question unanswered
Benjamin S. Hawkins Jr.
Mod. Log. 3(4): 376-383 (October 1993).

Abstract

The apparent absence, in reference or allusion, of Peirce to Frege and of Frege to Peirce, to work of the one in work of the other, and vice versa, would suggest — probably or even plausibly that neither Peirce nor Frege were aware of the other's work. It nevertheless seems almost inconceivable that Peirce and Frege could have been unaware of the the other's work, with circumstantial evidence available that would favour some likelihood of such awareness. This paper collates and speculates about the circumstantial evidence that is available.

Citation

Download Citation

Benjamin S. Hawkins Jr.. "Peirce and Frege, a question unanswered." Mod. Log. 3 (4) 376 - 383, October 1993.

Information

Published: October 1993
First available in Project Euclid: 6 March 2008

zbMATH: 0794.01008
MathSciNet: MR1241556

Subjects:
Primary: 01A55
Secondary: 01A60 , 03-03

Rights: Copyright © 1993 The Review of Modern Logic

Vol.3 • No. 4 • October 1993
Back to Top