Translator Disclaimer
September 2005 On constructing completions
Laura Crosilla, Hajime Ishihara, Peter Schuster
J. Symbolic Logic 70(3): 969-978 (September 2005). DOI: 10.2178/jsl/1122038923

Abstract

The Dedekind cuts in an ordered set form a set in the sense of constructiveZermelo—Fraenkel set theory. We deduce this statement from the principle ofrefinement, which we distill before from the axiom of fullness. Togetherwith exponentiation, refinement is equivalent to fullness. None of thedefining properties of an ordering is needed, and only refinement fortwo—element coverings is used.

In particular, the Dedekind reals form a set; whence we have also refined anearlier result by Aczel and Rathjen, who invoked the full form of fullness.To further generalise this, we look at Richman's method to complete anarbitrary metric space without sequences, which he designed to avoidcountable choice. The completion of a separable metric space turns out to bea set even if the original space is a proper class; in particular, everycomplete separable metric space automatically is a set.

Citation

Download Citation

Laura Crosilla. Hajime Ishihara. Peter Schuster. "On constructing completions." J. Symbolic Logic 70 (3) 969 - 978, September 2005. https://doi.org/10.2178/jsl/1122038923

Information

Published: September 2005
First available in Project Euclid: 22 July 2005

zbMATH: 1099.03044
MathSciNet: MR2155275
Digital Object Identifier: 10.2178/jsl/1122038923

Rights: Copyright © 2005 Association for Symbolic Logic

JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
Vol.70 • No. 3 • September 2005
Back to Top