Translator Disclaimer
January 2007 Computing with Actions and Communications
Wan Fokkink, Jan Willem Klop
Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 13(5): 789-805 (January 2007). DOI: 10.36045/bbms/1170347805

Abstract

The paradigm of computer science is nowadays shifting from computation to communication. In this paper we aim to give an impression of the algebra of actions and communications as it has been developed during the past quarter of a century. We present specifically the system ACP, Algebra of Communicating Processes. Here $a, b, c, \ldots$ denote atomic events (or actions, or steps). For example, $a{\cdot}a{\cdot}(b + c)$ is the process able to perform two $a$-steps followed by a $b$-step or a $c$-step. This differs from the process $a{\cdot}a{\cdot}b + a{\cdot}a{\cdot}c$, due to the different timing of the choice between a $b$- and a $c$-step. Process $x$ can operate in parallel with process $y$, notation $x \| y$, where some actions in $x$ may happen simultaneously with some actions in $y$; the resulting actions are called communication actions. Such actions are `half actions', needing their counterpart for the execution as a full action. In daily life a handshake is an example of a pair of half actions. We even have ternary communication actions on the keyboard of a PC: control-alt-delete. In music we find also quaternary actions, etc. The results of such internal communications we want to abstract away. This is formalised with the invisible action $\tau$ (`silent move'), facilitating the composition of modular hierarchies of process systems. The classical triple specification-implementation-verification then takes a straightforward form. The specification of the desired external behaviour is a simple process SPEC. The implementation is a complicated process IMP. The verification that the implementation is indeed correct, can be a purely algebraic, equational computation that a suitable abstraction of IMP yields SPEC: ABS(IMP) = SPEC. Next to an overview of the process algebraic framework, we present a soundness and completeness proof for the axiom system underlying this framework, with respect to a fundamental semantics called rooted branching bisimulation. Thus a derivation of ABS(IMP) = SPEC implies that the implementation and its specification satisfy the same behavioural properties (soundness), while on the other hand the absence of such a derivation implies that the implementation and its specification are not rooted branching bisimulation equivalent (completeness). Computing with actions and communications, process algebra, is logically and mathematically interesting. On top of that, process algebra contributes to security and comfort: current process algebra tools are used to prove correctness of railway emplacements, helicopter software, and communication protocols in the remote control of a television set. This paper has grown out of an invited lecture of the second author at the Joint Mathematical BeNeLuxFra Conference in Ghent, May 2005. Slides of that lecture can be found at www.cs.vu.nl/~jwk.

Citation

Download Citation

Wan Fokkink. Jan Willem Klop. "Computing with Actions and Communications." Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 13 (5) 789 - 805, January 2007. https://doi.org/10.36045/bbms/1170347805

Information

Published: January 2007
First available in Project Euclid: 1 February 2007

zbMATH: 1119.68127
MathSciNet: MR2293209
Digital Object Identifier: 10.36045/bbms/1170347805

Rights: Copyright © 2007 The Belgian Mathematical Society

JOURNAL ARTICLE
17 PAGES


SHARE
Vol.13 • No. 5 • January 2007
Back to Top