Translator Disclaimer
August 2007 Are volatility estimators robust with respect to modeling assumptions?
Yingying Li, Per A. Mykland
Bernoulli 13(3): 601-622 (August 2007). DOI: 10.3150/07-BEJ6067


We consider microstructure as an arbitrary contamination of the underlying latent securities price, through a Markov kernel Q. Special cases include additive error, rounding and combinations thereof. Our main result is that, subject to smoothness conditions, the two scales realized volatility is robust to the form of contamination Q. To push the limits of our result, we show what happens for some models that involve rounding (which is not, of course, smooth) and see in this situation how the robustness deteriorates with decreasing smoothness. Our conclusion is that under reasonable smoothness, one does not need to consider too closely how the microstructure is formed, while if severe non-smoothness is suspected, one needs to pay attention to the precise structure and also the use to which the estimator of volatility will be put.


Download Citation

Yingying Li. Per A. Mykland. "Are volatility estimators robust with respect to modeling assumptions?." Bernoulli 13 (3) 601 - 622, August 2007.


Published: August 2007
First available in Project Euclid: 7 August 2007

zbMATH: 1129.62097
MathSciNet: MR2348742
Digital Object Identifier: 10.3150/07-BEJ6067

Rights: Copyright © 2007 Bernoulli Society for Mathematical Statistics and Probability


Vol.13 • No. 3 • August 2007
Back to Top