Abstract
One of the theorems of Bengt Stolt’s article “On the Diophantine Equation u2−Dv2=4N” is not quite correct in its entirety. A counter-example will be given to show this. A modification of the theorem which he was trying to prove will be given for certain special cases.
Citation
Peter Heichelheim. "Some remarks on Stolt’s Theorems for Pellian Equations." Ark. Mat. 12 (1-2) 167 - 171, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02384753
Information