Translator Disclaimer
June 2011 Asymptotic Bayes-optimality under sparsity of some multiple testing procedures
Małgorzata Bogdan, Arijit Chakrabarti, Florian Frommlet, Jayanta K. Ghosh
Ann. Statist. 39(3): 1551-1579 (June 2011). DOI: 10.1214/10-AOS869


Within a Bayesian decision theoretic framework we investigate some asymptotic optimality properties of a large class of multiple testing rules. A parametric setup is considered, in which observations come from a normal scale mixture model and the total loss is assumed to be the sum of losses for individual tests. Our model can be used for testing point null hypotheses, as well as to distinguish large signals from a multitude of very small effects. A rule is defined to be asymptotically Bayes optimal under sparsity (ABOS), if within our chosen asymptotic framework the ratio of its Bayes risk and that of the Bayes oracle (a rule which minimizes the Bayes risk) converges to one. Our main interest is in the asymptotic scheme where the proportion p of “true” alternatives converges to zero.

We fully characterize the class of fixed threshold multiple testing rules which are ABOS, and hence derive conditions for the asymptotic optimality of rules controlling the Bayesian False Discovery Rate (BFDR). We finally provide conditions under which the popular Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) and Bonferroni procedures are ABOS and show that for a wide class of sparsity levels, the threshold of the former can be approximated by a nonrandom threshold.

It turns out that while the choice of asymptotically optimal FDR levels for BH depends on the relative cost of a type I error, it is almost independent of the level of sparsity. Specifically, we show that when the number of tests m increases to infinity, then BH with FDR level chosen in accordance with the assumed loss function is ABOS in the entire range of sparsity parameters pmβ, with β ∈ (0, 1].


Download Citation

Małgorzata Bogdan. Arijit Chakrabarti. Florian Frommlet. Jayanta K. Ghosh. "Asymptotic Bayes-optimality under sparsity of some multiple testing procedures." Ann. Statist. 39 (3) 1551 - 1579, June 2011.


Published: June 2011
First available in Project Euclid: 7 June 2011

zbMATH: 1221.62012
MathSciNet: MR2850212
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/10-AOS869

Primary: 62C25, 62F05
Secondary: 62C10

Rights: Copyright © 2011 Institute of Mathematical Statistics


Vol.39 • No. 3 • June 2011
Back to Top