Open Access
August 2006 Affinely invariant matching methods with discriminant mixtures of proportional ellipsoidally symmetric distributions
Donald B. Rubin, Elizabeth A. Stuart
Ann. Statist. 34(4): 1814-1826 (August 2006). DOI: 10.1214/009053606000000407

Abstract

In observational studies designed to estimate the effects of interventions or exposures, such as cigarette smoking, it is desirable to try to control background differences between the treated group (e.g., current smokers) and the control group (e.g., never smokers) on covariates X (e.g., age, education). Matched sampling attempts to effect this control by selecting subsets of the treated and control groups with similar distributions of such covariates. This paper examines the consequences of matching using affinely invariant methods when the covariate distributions are “discriminant mixtures of proportional ellipsoidally symmetric” (DMPES) distributions, a class herein defined, which generalizes the ellipsoidal symmetry class of Rubin and Thomas [Ann. Statist. 20 (1992) 1079–1093]. The resulting generalized results help indicate why earlier results hold quite well even when the simple assumption of ellipsoidal symmetry is not met [e.g., Biometrics 52 (1996) 249–264]. Extensions to conditionally affinely invariant matching with conditionally DMPES distributions are also discussed.

Citation

Download Citation

Donald B. Rubin. Elizabeth A. Stuart. "Affinely invariant matching methods with discriminant mixtures of proportional ellipsoidally symmetric distributions." Ann. Statist. 34 (4) 1814 - 1826, August 2006. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053606000000407

Information

Published: August 2006
First available in Project Euclid: 3 November 2006

zbMATH: 1246.62159
MathSciNet: MR2283718
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/009053606000000407

Subjects:
Primary: 62D05 , 62H05
Secondary: 60E05 , 62H30 , 62K99

Keywords: Causal inference , equal percent bias reducing (EPBR) , matched sampling , propensity scores

Rights: Copyright © 2006 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

Vol.34 • No. 4 • August 2006
Back to Top