Translator Disclaimer
September, 1994 Two-Sided Tests and One-Sided Confidence Bounds
H. Finner
Ann. Statist. 22(3): 1502-1516 (September, 1994). DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176325639


Based on the duality between tests and confidence sets we introduce a new method to derive one-sided confidence bounds following the rejection of a null hypothesis with two-sided alternatives. This method imputes that the experimenter is only interested in confidence bounds if the null hypothesis is rejected. Furthermore, we suppose that he is only interested in the direction and a lower confidence bound concerning the distance of the true parameter value to the parameter values in the null hypothesis. If the null hypothesis is rejected, the new one-sided confidence bounds are always not worse than the corresponding bounds of the two-sided confidence interval approach. If the true parameter is far away from the null hypothesis, the new bounds tend to be nearly equal to the corresponding one-sided confidence bounds with full confidence level $1 - \alpha$. The new method will be studied and illustrated in more detail in one-parameter exponential families and location families with unimodal Lebesgue densities, and, as an example where conditional tests are available, we consider the comparison of two Poission distributions. In case of the normal distribution with unknown variance we propose among others a modification of a procedure of Hodges and Lehmann. Here it may be surprising that there exist situations where the new method yields confidence bounds exactly matching the classical one-sided confidence bounds.


Download Citation

H. Finner. "Two-Sided Tests and One-Sided Confidence Bounds." Ann. Statist. 22 (3) 1502 - 1516, September, 1994.


Published: September, 1994
First available in Project Euclid: 11 April 2007

zbMATH: 0818.62021
MathSciNet: MR1311986
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/aos/1176325639

Primary: 62F03
Secondary: 62F25

Rights: Copyright © 1994 Institute of Mathematical Statistics


Vol.22 • No. 3 • September, 1994
Back to Top