Translator Disclaimer
September, 1990 A Comparison of Generalized Cross Validation and Modified Maximum Likelihood for Estimating the Parameters of a Stochastic Process
Michael L. Stein
Ann. Statist. 18(3): 1139-1157 (September, 1990). DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176347743

Abstract

Wahba compared the performance of generalized cross validation (GCV) and modified maximum likelihood (MML) procedures for choosing the smoothing parameter of a smoothing spline. This work makes a more careful study of the two procedures when the stochastic model motivating the modified maximum likelihood estimate is correct. In particular, it is shown that in the case of the linear smoothing spline with equally spaced observations, both estimates are asymptotically normal with the GCV estimate having twice the asymptotic variance of the MML estimate. The impact of using these estimates on the subsequent predictions is also calculated. Conjectures on how these results should generalize to higher order smoothing splines are developed. These conjectures suggest that the penalty for using GCV instead of MML when the stochastic model is correct is greater for higher order smoothing splines, both in terms of the efficiency in estimating the smoothing parameter and the impact on subsequent predictions.

Citation

Download Citation

Michael L. Stein. "A Comparison of Generalized Cross Validation and Modified Maximum Likelihood for Estimating the Parameters of a Stochastic Process." Ann. Statist. 18 (3) 1139 - 1157, September, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176347743

Information

Published: September, 1990
First available in Project Euclid: 12 April 2007

zbMATH: 0734.62091
MathSciNet: MR1062702
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/aos/1176347743

Subjects:
Primary: 62M20
Secondary: 60G15, 62G05

Rights: Copyright © 1990 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

JOURNAL ARTICLE
19 PAGES


SHARE
Vol.18 • No. 3 • September, 1990
Back to Top