Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
July 2009 Uniform limit theorems for wavelet density estimators
Evarist Giné, Richard Nickl
Ann. Probab. 37(4): 1605-1646 (July 2009). DOI: 10.1214/08-AOP447


Let pn(y)=∑kα̂kϕ(yk)+∑l=0jn−1kβ̂lk2l/2ψ(2lyk) be the linear wavelet density estimator, where ϕ, ψ are a father and a mother wavelet (with compact support), α̂k, β̂lk are the empirical wavelet coefficients based on an i.i.d. sample of random variables distributed according to a density p0 on ℝ, and jn∈ℤ, jn∞. Several uniform limit theorems are proved: First, the almost sure rate of convergence of sup y∈ℝ|pn(y)−Epn(y)| is obtained, and a law of the logarithm for a suitably scaled version of this quantity is established. This implies that sup y∈ℝ|pn(y)−p0(y)| attains the optimal almost sure rate of convergence for estimating p0, if jn is suitably chosen. Second, a uniform central limit theorem as well as strong invariance principles for the distribution function of pn, that is, for the stochastic processes $\sqrt{n}(F_{n}^{W}(s)-F(s))=\sqrt{n}\int_{-\infty}^{s}(p_{n}-p_{0})$, s∈ℝ, are proved; and more generally, uniform central limit theorems for the processes $\sqrt{n}\int(p_{n}-p_{0})f$, $f\in\mathcal{F}$, for other Donsker classes $\mathcal{F}$ of interest are considered. As a statistical application, it is shown that essentially the same limit theorems can be obtained for the hard thresholding wavelet estimator introduced by Donoho et al. [Ann. Statist. 24 (1996) 508–539].


Download Citation

Evarist Giné. Richard Nickl. "Uniform limit theorems for wavelet density estimators." Ann. Probab. 37 (4) 1605 - 1646, July 2009.


Published: July 2009
First available in Project Euclid: 21 July 2009

zbMATH: 1255.62103
MathSciNet: MR2546757
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/08-AOP447

Primary: 62G07
Secondary: 60F05 , 60F15 , 60F17

Keywords: adaptive estimation , law of the logarithm , rates of convergence , sup-norm loss , uniform central limit theorem , Wavelet density estimator , wavelet thresholding

Rights: Copyright © 2009 Institute of Mathematical Statistics


Vol.37 • No. 4 • July 2009
Back to Top