Open Access
February, 1971 Rates of Weak Convergence and Asymptotic Expansions for Classical Central Limit Theorems
R. N. Bhattacharya
Ann. Math. Statist. 42(1): 241-259 (February, 1971). DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177693509

Abstract

Let $Q_n(n = 1,2, \cdots), Q$ be probability measures on the Borel $\sigma$-field of $R^k$. The sequence $\{Q_n\}$ converges weakly to $Q$ if for every real-valued, bounded, almost surely $(Q)$ continuous function $g$ on $R^k$ the convergence \begin{equation*}\tag{0.1} \lim_n \inf g dQ_n = \int g dQ\end{equation*} holds (cf. [9], Chapter 1). Such functions $g$ are called $Q$-continuous. If the indicator function $I_A$ of the set $A$ is $Q$-continuous, then $A$ is also called $Q$-continuous. If $\mathscr{F}$ is a class of $Q$-continuous functions $g$ over which the convergence (0.1) is uniform for every sequence $\{Q_n\}$ converging weakly to $Q$, then $\mathscr{F}$ is called a $Q$-uniformity class. A class of sets is called a $Q$-uniformity class if the indicator functions of the sets of this class form a $Q$-uniformity class of functions. A systematic study of $Q$-uniformity (in separable metric spaces) was initiated by Ranga Rao [21], who obtained a number of nice results. His studies were carried further in a very useful manner by Billingsley and Topsoe [10]. In this article the error of normal approximation $|\int g d(Q_n - \Phi)|$ is estimated for arbitrary $\Phi$-continuous $g, \Phi$ being the $k$-dimensional standard normal distribution and $Q_n$ the distribution of the appropriately normalised $n$th partial sum of a sequence of independent $k$-dimensional random vectors $\{X^{(r)}; r = 1,2,\cdots\}$. The classical central limit theorems assert weak convergence of $\{Q_n\}$ to $\Phi$ under certain moment conditions. It is shown here (Theorem 1, Section 3) that for an arbitrary real-valued, bounded, measurable $g$ on $R^k$ one has $(0.2) \quad |\int g d(Q_n - \Phi)| \leqq c(k, \delta)\omega_g(R^k) \rho^{3(1 + \delta)/(3 + \delta)}_{3 + \delta,n} n^{-\frac{1}{2}} + \int \omega_g(S(x, \varepsilon_n)) d\Phi(x)$, where $\delta$ is any positive number; $\rho_{3+\delta, n}$ is defined by (1.4), and \begin{equation*}\tag{0.3}\begin{align*} \omega_g(A) &= \sup \{|g(x) - g(y)|; x, y \epsilon A\}, S(x, \varepsilon) = \{y; |x - y| < \varepsilon\}, \\ \varepsilon_n &= c(k) \rho^{3/(3+\delta)}_{3 + \delta, n} n^{-\frac{1}{2}} \log n,\end{align*}\end{equation} $c(k), c(k, \delta)$ being positive constants depending only on their respective arguments. If $\varepsilon_n$ goes to zero as $n$ goes to infinity, then the right side of (0.2) goes to zero for every $\Phi$-continuous $g$. For the rest of this section let us assume that $\{\rho_{3+\delta,n\}}$ is bounded. By (0.2), if $\int \omega_g(S(x, \varepsilon)) d\Phi(x) = O(\varepsilon)$ as $\varepsilon$ goes to zero, then the error of approximation is $O(n^{-\frac{1}{2}} \log n)$. One may also use (0.2) to obtain uniform upper bounds for errors of approximation over arbitrary $\Phi$-uniformity classes. In particular, $(0.4) \quad \sup\{|\int g d(Q_n - \Phi)|; g \epsilon \mathscr{F}_1(\Phi; c, d, \varepsilon_0)\} = O(n^{-\frac{1}{2}}\log n)$, where $(0.5) \quad \mathscr{F}_1(\Phi; c, d, \varepsilon_0) = \{g; \omega_g(R^k) \leqq c, \int \omega_g(S(\cdot, \varepsilon)) d\Phi \leqq \varepsilon\text{for} 0 < \varepsilon \leqq \varepsilon_0\}$, $c, d, \varepsilon_0$ being arbitrary positive constants. For the largest translation-invariant subclass of this class a sharper bound $O(n^{-\frac{1}{2}})$, which is best possible, was obtained in [3], [5], (cf. [4]). A similar result (in the i.i.d. case) has been independently obtained by Von Bahr [22]. As applications one obtains precise bounds for many interesting classes of sets and functions. However, there are $\Phi$-continuous functions and $\Phi$-uniformity classes of functions for which the technique used in [5] or [22] is not effective. An example in Section 3 shows that there are Borel sets $A$ such that the upper bound for $|Q_n(A) - \Phi(A)|$ as provided by [5] (Theorem 1) is $O(1)$, while (0.2) provides the bound $O(n^{-\frac{1}{2}}\log n)$. A modification of the bound (0.2) when applied to $g = I_A$ for an arbitrary Borel set $A$ enables one to show that the Prokhorov distance between $Q_n$ and $\Phi$ is $O(n^{-\frac{1}{2}}\log n)$. It is not known whether the factor $\log n$ in the expression for $\varepsilon_n$ in (0.3) (and, hence, in (0.4) and in the estimate of Prokhorov's distance) may be dispensed with or not. However, under Cramer's condition (3.42) $\log n$ may be replaced by one. The remaining theorems are proved for the i.i.d. case, partly for the sake of simplicity and partly because of the non-availability in the existing literature of complete proofs for some of the expansions related to the characteristic function of $Q_n$ in the non-identically distributed case. Theorem 2 provides an asymptotic expansion for $\int g dQ_n$ with a remainder term which is $o(n^{-(s-2)/2})$ uniformly over all $g$ in $\mathscr{F}_1^\ast(\Phi; c, d, \varepsilon_0)$, the largest translation-invariant subclass of $\mathscr{F}_1(\Phi; c, d, \varepsilon_0)$, when $E|X^{(1)}|^s < \infty$ for some integer $s$ not smaller than three and the characteristic function of $X^{(1)}$ obeys Cramer's condition (3.42)'. Applications to the class $\mathscr{L}$ of all measurable convex sets, the class $L(c, d)$ (see (3.54)) of bounded Lipschitzian functions, etc., are immediate. Theorem 3 gives an asymptotic expansion for $\int g dQ_n$ for a very special class of functions $g$ when no restriction like (3.42)' is imposed. Theorem 4 provides some classes of functions $g$ (under varying restrictions on the distribution of $X^{(1)}$) for which the error of approximation $|\int g d(Q_n - \Phi)|$ is of the order $O(n^{-1})$. Section 1 introduces notation to be used throughout the article. Section 2 provides basic lemmas for proving the results (outlined above) of Section 3.

Citation

Download Citation

R. N. Bhattacharya. "Rates of Weak Convergence and Asymptotic Expansions for Classical Central Limit Theorems." Ann. Math. Statist. 42 (1) 241 - 259, February, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177693509

Information

Published: February, 1971
First available in Project Euclid: 27 April 2007

zbMATH: 0224.60014
MathSciNet: MR279860
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/aoms/1177693509

Rights: Copyright © 1971 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

Vol.42 • No. 1 • February, 1971
Back to Top