Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
December 2014 Detecting duplicates in a homicide registry using a Bayesian partitioning approach
Mauricio Sadinle
Ann. Appl. Stat. 8(4): 2404-2434 (December 2014). DOI: 10.1214/14-AOAS779


Finding duplicates in homicide registries is an important step in keeping an accurate account of lethal violence. This task is not trivial when unique identifiers of the individuals are not available, and it is especially challenging when records are subject to errors and missing values. Traditional approaches to duplicate detection output independent decisions on the coreference status of each pair of records, which often leads to nontransitive decisions that have to be reconciled in some ad-hoc fashion. The task of finding duplicate records in a data file can be alternatively posed as partitioning the data file into groups of coreferent records. We present an approach that targets this partition of the file as the parameter of interest, thereby ensuring transitive decisions. Our Bayesian implementation allows us to incorporate prior information on the reliability of the fields in the data file, which is especially useful when no training data are available, and it also provides a proper account of the uncertainty in the duplicate detection decisions. We present a study to detect killings that were reported multiple times to the United Nations Truth Commission for El Salvador.


Download Citation

Mauricio Sadinle. "Detecting duplicates in a homicide registry using a Bayesian partitioning approach." Ann. Appl. Stat. 8 (4) 2404 - 2434, December 2014.


Published: December 2014
First available in Project Euclid: 19 December 2014

zbMATH: 06408784
MathSciNet: MR3292503
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/14-AOAS779

Keywords: Deduplication , distribution on partitions , duplicate detection , entity resolution , Hispanic names , homicide records , human rights , record linkage , string similarity , United Nations Truth Commission for El Salvador

Rights: Copyright © 2014 Institute of Mathematical Statistics


Vol.8 • No. 4 • December 2014
Back to Top