Abstract
Although not without controversy, readmission is entrenched as a hospital quality metric with statistical analyses generally based on fitting a logistic-Normal generalized linear mixed model. Such analyses, however, ignore death as a competing risk, although doing so for clinical conditions with high mortality can have profound effects; a hospital’s seemingly good performance for readmission may be an artifact of it having poor performance for mortality. In this paper we propose novel multivariate hospital-level performance measures for readmission and mortality that derive from framing the analysis as one of cluster-correlated semi-competing risks data. We also consider a number of profiling-related goals, including the identification of extreme performers and a bivariate classification of whether the hospital has higher-/lower-than-expected readmission and mortality rates via a Bayesian decision-theoretic approach that characterizes hospitals on the basis of minimizing the posterior expected loss for an appropriate loss function. In some settings, particularly if the number of hospitals is large, the computational burden may be prohibitive. To resolve this, we propose a series of analysis strategies that will be useful in practice. Throughout, the methods are illustrated with data from CMS on patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer between 2000–2012 at one of hospitals in California.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by NIH grant R01 CA181360-01.
Citation
Sebastien Haneuse. Deborah Schrag. Francesca Dominici. Sharon-Lise Normand. Kyu Ha Lee. "Measuring performance for end-of-life care." Ann. Appl. Stat. 16 (3) 1586 - 1607, September 2022. https://doi.org/10.1214/21-AOAS1558
Information