Open Access
2016 A counterexample to the Hopf–Oleinik lemma (elliptic case)
Darya E. Apushkinskaya, Alexander I. Nazarov
Anal. PDE 9(2): 439-458 (2016). DOI: 10.2140/apde.2016.9.439

Abstract

We construct a new counterexample to the Hopf–Oleinik boundary point lemma. It shows that for convex domains, the C1,Dini assumption on Ω is the necessary and sufficient condition providing the estimates of Hopf–Oleinik type.

Citation

Download Citation

Darya E. Apushkinskaya. Alexander I. Nazarov. "A counterexample to the Hopf–Oleinik lemma (elliptic case)." Anal. PDE 9 (2) 439 - 458, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2140/apde.2016.9.439

Information

Received: 2 April 2015; Revised: 29 September 2015; Accepted: 16 December 2015; Published: 2016
First available in Project Euclid: 16 November 2017

zbMATH: 1354.35024
MathSciNet: MR3513140
Digital Object Identifier: 10.2140/apde.2016.9.439

Subjects:
Primary: 35B45 , 35J15

Keywords: counterexample , Dini continuity , elliptic equations , Hopf–Oleinik lemma

Rights: Copyright © 2016 Mathematical Sciences Publishers

Vol.9 • No. 2 • 2016
MSP
Back to Top