2022 GKM manifolds are not rigid
Oliver Goertsches, Panagiotis Konstantis, Leopold Zoller
Algebr. Geom. Topol. 22(7): 3511-3532 (2022). DOI: 10.2140/agt.2022.22.3511

Abstract

We construct effective GKM T3–actions with connected stabilizers on the total spaces of the two S2–bundles over S6 with identical GKM graphs. This shows that the GKM graph of a simply connected integer GKM manifold with connected stabilizers does not determine its homotopy type. We complement this by a discussion of the minimality of this example: the homotopy type of integer GKM manifolds with connected stabilizers is indeed encoded in the GKM graph for smaller dimensions, lower complexity, or lower number of fixed points. Regarding geometric structures on the new example, we find an almost complex structure which is invariant under the action of a subtorus. In addition to the minimal example, we provide an analogous example where the torus actions are Hamiltonian, which disproves symplectic cohomological rigidity for Hamiltonian integer GKM manifolds.

Citation

Download Citation

Oliver Goertsches. Panagiotis Konstantis. Leopold Zoller. "GKM manifolds are not rigid." Algebr. Geom. Topol. 22 (7) 3511 - 3532, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2140/agt.2022.22.3511

Information

Received: 3 March 2021; Accepted: 30 September 2021; Published: 2022
First available in Project Euclid: 14 February 2023

MathSciNet: MR4545925
zbMATH: 1512.57048
Digital Object Identifier: 10.2140/agt.2022.22.3511

Subjects:
Primary: 57R91
Secondary: 53D20 , 55N91

Keywords: cohomological rigidity , equivariant cohomology , GKM theory , Hamiltonian action

Rights: Copyright © 2022 Mathematical Sciences Publishers

JOURNAL ARTICLE
22 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

Vol.22 • No. 7 • 2022
MSP
Back to Top