Abstract
If the free algebra on one generator in a variety of algebras (in the sense of universal algebra) has a subalgebra free on two generators, must it also have a subalgebra free on three generators? In general, no; but yes if generates the variety .
Generalizing the argument, it is shown that if we are given an algebra and subalgebras, , in a prevariety (-closed class of algebras) such that generates , and also subalgebras such that for each the subalgebra of generated by and is their coproduct in , then the subalgebra of generated by is the coproduct in of these algebras.
Some further results on coproducts are noted:
If satisfies the amalgamation property, then one has the stronger “transitivity” statement, that if has a finite family of subalgebras such that the subalgebra of generated by the is their coproduct, and each has a finite family of subalgebras with the same property, then the subalgebra of generated by all the is their coproduct.
For a residually small prevariety or an arbitrary quasivariety, relationships are proved between the least number of algebras needed to generate as a prevariety or quasivariety, and behavior of the coproduct operation in .
It is shown by example that for a subgroup of the group of all permutations of an infinite set , the group need not have a subgroup isomorphic over to the coproduct with amalgamation . But under various additional hypotheses on , the question remains open.
Citation
George Bergman. "On coproducts in varieties, quasivarieties and prevarieties." Algebra Number Theory 3 (8) 847 - 879, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2140/ant.2009.3.847
Information