## Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics

### Silting Modules over Triangular Matrix Rings

#### Abstract

Let $\Lambda$, $\Gamma$ be rings and $R = \left( \begin{smallmatrix} \Lambda & 0 \\ M & \Gamma \end{smallmatrix} \right)$ the triangular matrix ring with $M$ a $(\Gamma,\Lambda)$-bimodule. Let $X$ be a right $\Lambda$-module and $Y$ a right $\Gamma$-module. We prove that $(X,0) \oplus (Y \otimes_{\Gamma} M, Y)$ is a silting right $R$-module if and only if both $X_{\Lambda}$ and $Y_{\Gamma}$ are silting modules and $Y \otimes_{\Gamma} M$ is generated by $X$. Furthermore, we prove that if $\Lambda$ and $\Gamma$ are finite dimensional algebras over an algebraically closed field and $X_{\Lambda}$ and $Y_{\Gamma}$ are finitely generated, then $(X,0) \oplus (Y \otimes_{\Gamma} M, Y)$ is a support $\tau$-tilting $R$-module if and only if both $X_{\Lambda}$ and $Y_{\Gamma}$ are support $\tau$-tilting modules, $\operatorname{Hom}_{\Lambda}(Y \otimes_{\Gamma} M, \tau X) = 0$ and $\operatorname{Hom}_{\Lambda}(e\Lambda, Y \otimes_{\Gamma} M) = 0$ with $e$ the maximal idempotent such that $\operatorname{Hom}_{\Lambda}(e\Lambda,X) = 0$.

#### Article information

Source
Taiwanese J. Math., Advance publication (2020), 21 pages.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 19 February 2020

https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.twjm/1582102818

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.11650/tjm/200204

#### Citation

Gao, Hanpeng; Huang, Zhaoyong. Silting Modules over Triangular Matrix Rings. Taiwanese J. Math., advance publication, 19 February 2020. doi:10.11650/tjm/200204. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.twjm/1582102818

#### References

• T. Adachi, O. Iyama and I. Reiten, $\tau$-tilting theory, Compos. Math. 150 (2014), no. 3, 415–452.
• L. Angeleri Hügel and M. Hrbek, Silting modules over commutative rings, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2017 (2017), no. 13, 4131–4151.
• L. Angeleri Hügel, F. Marks and J. Vitória, Silting modules, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2016 (2016), no. 4, 1251–1284.
• ––––, Silting modules and ring epimorphisms, Adv. Math. 303 (2016), 1044–1076.
• I. Assem, D. Happel and S. Trepode, Extending tilting modules to one-point extensions by projectives, Comm. Algebra 35 (2007), no. 10, 2983–3006.
• I. Assem and N. Marmaridis, Tilting modules over split-by-nilpotent extensions, Comm. Algebra 26 (1998), no. 5, 1547–1555.
• I. Assem, D. Simson and A. Skowroński, Elements of the Representation Theory of Associative Algebras, Vol. 1: Techniques of Representation Theory, London Mathematical Society Student Texts 65, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.
• M. Auslander, I. Reiten and S. O. Smalø, Representation Theory of Artin Algebras, Corrected reprint of the 1995 original, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 36, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
• S. Breaz, The ascent-descent property for $2$-term silting complexes, arXiv:1905.02885.
• S. Breaz and F. Pop, Cosilting modules, Algebr. Represent. Theory 20 (2017), no. 5, 1305–1321.
• S. Breaz and J. Žemlička, Torsion classes generated by silting modules, Ark. Mat. 56 (2018), no. 1, 15–52.
• Q. Chen, M. Gong and W. Rump, Tilting and trivial extensions, Arch. Math. (Basel) 93 (2009), no. 6, 531–540.
• R. Colpi and J. Trlifaj, Tilting modules and tilting torsion theories, J. Algebra 178 (1995), no. 2, 614–634.
• E. L. Green, On the representation theory of rings in matrix form, Pacific. J. Math. 100 (1982), no. 1, 123–138.
• D. Happel and L. Unger, On a partial order of tilting modules, Algebr. Represent. Theory 8 (2005), no. 2, 147–156.
• F. Li, Modulation and natural valued quiver of an algebra, Pacific J. Math. 256 (2012), no. 1, 105–128.
• Y. Miyashita, Tilting modules of finite projective dimension, Math. Z. 193 (1986), no. 1, 113–146.
• D. Simson and A. Skowroński, Elements of the Representation Theory of Associative Algebras, Vol. 3: Representation-Infinite Tilted Algebras, London Mathematical Society Student Texts 72, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007.
• P. Suarez, $\tau$-tilting modules over one-point extensions by a projective module, Algebr. Represent. Theory 21 (2018), no. 4, 769–786.