Project Euclid

References

• Adelfio, G. and Chiodi, M. (2015a). Alternated estimation in semi-parametric space–time branching-type point processes with application to seismic catalogs. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 29 443–450.
• Adelfio, G. and Chiodi, M. (2015b). FLP estimation of semi-parametric models for space–time point processes and diagnostic tools. Spat. Stat. 14 119–132.
• Bacry, E., Mastromatteo, I. and Muzy, J.-F. (2015). Hawkes processes in finance. Mark. Microstruct. Liq. 1 1550005.
• Baddeley, A., Møller, J. and Pakes, A. G. (2007). Properties of residuals for spatial point processes. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 60 627–649.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1169.62081
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/s10463-007-0116-6
  
• Baddeley, A., Rubak, E. and Møller, J. (2011). Score, pseudo-score and residual diagnostics for spatial point process models. Statist. Sci. 26 613–646.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1332.62363
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/11-STS367
  Project Euclid: euclid.ss/1330437942
  
• Baddeley, A., Turner, R., Møller, J. and Hazelton, M. (2005). Residual analysis for spatial point processes. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 67 617–666.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1112.62302
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00519.x
  
• Bauwens, L. and Hautsch, N. (2009). Modelling financial high frequency data using point processes. In Handbook of Financial Time Series (T. Mikosch, J.-P. Kreiß, R. A. Davis and T. G. Andersen, eds.) 953–979. Springer, Berlin.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1178.91218
  
• Bernasco, W., Johnson, S. D. and Ruiter, S. (2015). Learning where to offend: Effects of past on future burglary locations. Appl. Geogr. 60 120–129.
• Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A. V. and Hureau, D. M. (2014). The effects of hot spots policing on crime: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Q. 31 633–663.
• Bray, A. and Schoenberg, F. P. (2013). Assessment of point process models for earthquake forecasting. Statist. Sci. 28 510–520.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1331.86016
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/13-STS440
  Project Euclid: euclid.ss/1386078876
  
• Bray, A., Wong, K., Barr, C. D. and Schoenberg, F. P. (2014). Voronoi residual analysis of spatial point process models with applications to California earthquake forecasts. Ann. Appl. Stat. 8 2247–2267.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 06408777
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/14-AOAS767
  Project Euclid: euclid.aoas/1419001742
  
• Brockmann, D., Hufnagel, L. and Geisel, T. (2006). The scaling laws of human travel. Nature 439 462–465.
• Chen, J. M., Hawkes, A. G., Scalas, E. and Trinh, M. (2017). Performance of information criteria used for model selection of Hawkes process models of financial data. Available at arXiv:1702.06055.
  arXiv: 1702.06055
  
• Chiodi, M. and Adelfio, G. (2011). Forward likelihood-based predictive approach for space–time point processes. Environmetrics 22 749–757.
• Clarke, R. V. and Cornish, D. B. (1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. Crime Justice 6 147–185.
• Clements, R. A., Schoenberg, F. P. and Veen, A. (2012). Evaluation of space–time point process models using super-thinning. Environmetrics 23 606–616.
• Cohen, L. E. and Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. Am. Sociol. Rev. 44 588–608.
• Cohen, J., Gorr, W. L. and Olligschlaeger, A. M. (2007). Leading indicators and spatial interactions: A crime-forecasting model for proactive police deployment. Geogr. Anal. 39 105–127.
• Cowling, A. and Hall, P. (1996). On pseudodata methods for removing boundary effects in kernel density estimation. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 58 551–563.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0855.62027
  
• Cressie, N. and Wikle, C. K. (2011). Statistics for Spatio-Temporal Data. Wiley, New York.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1273.62017
  
• Daley, D. J. and Vere-Jones, D. (2003). An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Volume I: Elementary Theory and Methods, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1026.60061
  
• Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M. and Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximimum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 39 1–38.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0364.62022
  
• Diggle, P. J. (2014). Statistical Analysis of Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Point Patterns, 3rd ed. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 128. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 06213928
  
• Diggle, P. J., Moraga, P., Rowlingson, B. and Taylor, B. M. (2013). Spatial and spatio-temporal log-Gaussian Cox processes: Extending the geostatistical paradigm. Statist. Sci. 28 542–563.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1331.86027
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/13-STS441
  Project Euclid: euclid.ss/1386078878
  
• Fotheringham, A. S. and Wong, D. W. S. (1991). The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environ. Plann. A. 23 1025–1044.
• Fox, E. W., Schoenberg, F. P. and Gordon, J. S. (2016). Spatially inhomogeneous background rate estimators and uncertainty quantification for nonparametric Hawkes point process models of earthquake occurrences. Ann. Appl. Stat. 10 1725–1756.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 06775284
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/16-AOAS957
  Project Euclid: euclid.aoas/1475069625
  
• Fox, E. W., Short, M. B., Schoenberg, F. P., Coronges, K. D. and Bertozzi, A. L. (2016). Modeling e-mail networks and inferring leadership using self-exciting point processes. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 111 564–584.
• Freed, A. M. (2005). Earthquake triggering by static, dynamic, and postseismic stress transfer. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 33 335–367.
• González, J. A., Rodríguez-Cortés, F. J., Cronie, O. and Mateu, J. (2016). Spatio-temporal point process statistics: A review. Spat. Stat. 18 505–544.
• Gorr, W. L. and Lee, Y. (2015). Early warning system for temporary crime hot spots. J. Quant. Criminol. 31 25–47.
• Gray, A. G. and Moore, A. W. (2003). Nonparametric density estimation: Toward computational tractability. In SIAM International Conference on Data Mining 203–211. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.
• Green, B., Horel, T. and Papachristos, A. V. (2017). Modeling contagion through social networks to explain and predict gunshot violence in Chicago, 2006 to 2014. JAMA Intern. Med. 177 326–333.
• Harte, D. S. (2012). Bias in fitting the ETAS model: A case study based on New Zealand seismicity. Geophys. J. Int. 192 390–412.
• Hawkes, A. G. (1971). Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika 51 83–90.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0219.60029
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biomet/58.1.83
  
• Hawkes, A. G. and Oakes, D. (1974). A cluster process representation of a self-exciting process. J. Appl. Probab. 11 493–503.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0305.60021
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/3212693
  
• Johnson, D. H. (1996). Point process models of single-neuron discharges. J. Comput. Neurosci. 3 275–299.
• Kumazawa, T. and Ogata, Y. (2014). Nonstationary ETAS models for nonstandard earthquakes. Ann. Appl. Stat. 8 1825–1852.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1304.86011
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/14-AOAS759
  Project Euclid: euclid.aoas/1414091236
  
• Lewis, P. A. W. and Shedler, G. S. (1979). Simulation of nonhomogeneous Poisson processes by thinning. Nav. Res. Logist. Q. 26 403–413.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0497.60003
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1002/nav.3800260304
  
• Lewis, E., Mohler, G., Brantingham, P. J. and Bertozzi, A. L. (2011). Self-exciting point process models of civilian deaths in Iraq. Secur. J. 25 244–264.
• Lippiello, E., Giacco, F., de Arcangelis, L., Marzocchi, W. and Godano, C. (2014). Parameter estimation in the ETAS model: Approximations and novel methods. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 104 985–994.
• Loeffler, C. and Flaxman, S. (2016). Is gun violence contagious? Available at arXiv:1611.06713.
  arXiv: 1611.06713
  
• Marsan, D. and Lengliné, O. (2008). Extending earthquakes’ reach through cascading. Science 319 1076–1079.
• Marsan, D. and Lengliné, O. (2010). A new estimation of the decay of aftershock density with distance to the mainshock. J. Geophys. Res. 115 B09302.
• McLachlan, G. J. and Krishnan, T. (2008). The EM Algorithm and Extensions, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1165.62019
  
• Meyer, S. (2010). Spatio-temporal infectious disease epidemiology based on point processes. Master’s thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Univ. München.
• Meyer, S., Elias, J. and Höhle, M. (2012). A space–time conditional intensity model for invasive meningococcal disease occurrence. Biometrics 68 607–616.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1274.92034
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01684.x
  
• Meyer, S. and Held, L. (2014). Power-law models for infectious disease spread. Ann. Appl. Stat. 8 1612–1639.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1304.62135
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/14-AOAS743
  Project Euclid: euclid.aoas/1414091227
  
• Meyer, S., Warnke, I., Rössler, W. and Held, L. (2016). Model-based testing for space–time interaction using point processes: An application to psychiatric hospital admissions in an urban area. Spat. Spatio-temporal Epidemiol. 17 15–25.
• Mohler, G. O. (2014). Marked point process hotspot maps for homicide and gun crime prediction in Chicago. Int. J. Forecast. 30 491–497.
• Mohler, G. O., Short, M. B., Brantingham, P. J., Schoenberg, F. P. and Tita, G. E. (2011). Self-exciting point process modeling of crime. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106 100–108.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 06446588
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1198/jasa.2011.ap09546
  
• Møller, J. and Rasmussen, J. G. (2005). Perfect simulation of Hawkes processes. Adv. in Appl. Probab. 37 629–646.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1074.60057
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1017/S0001867800000392
  Project Euclid: euclid.aap/1127483739
  
• Musmeci, F. and Vere-Jones, D. (1992). A space–time clustering model for historical earthquakes. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 44 1–11.
• Nandan, S., Ouillon, G., Wiemer, S. and Sornette, D. (2017). Objective estimation of spatially variable parameters of epidemic type aftershock sequence model: Application to California. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 122 5118–5143.
• Nsoesie, E. O., Brownstein, J. S., Ramakrishnan, N. and Marathe, M. V. (2013). A systematic review of studies on forecasting the dynamics of influenza outbreaks. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 8 309–316.
• Ogata, Y. (1978). The asymptotic behaviour of maximum likelihood estimators for stationary point processes. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 30 243–261.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0451.62067
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF02480216
  
• Ogata, Y. (1998). Space–time point-process models for earthquake occurrences. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 50 379–402.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0947.62061
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1023/A:1003403601725
  
• Ogata, Y. (1999). Seismicity analysis through point-process modeling: A review. Pure Appl. Geophys. 155 471–507.
• Ogata, Y. and Katsura, K. (1988). Likelihood analysis of spatial inhomogeneity for marked point patterns. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 40 29–39.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0668.62084
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF00053953
  
• Ogata, Y., Katsura, K. and Tanemura, M. (2003). Modelling heterogeneous space–time occurrences of earthquakes and its residual analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C. Appl. Stat. 52 499–509.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1111.86301
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/1467-9876.00420
  
• Ogata, Y. and Zhuang, J. (2006). Space–time ETAS models and an improved extension. Tectonophysics 413 13–23.
• Peng, R. D., Schoenberg, F. P. and Woods, J. A. (2005). A space–time conditional intensity model for evaluating a wildfire hazard index. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100 26–35.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1117.62411
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1198/016214504000001763
  
• Porter, M. D. and White, G. (2012). Self-exciting hurdle models for terrorist activity. Ann. Appl. Stat. 6 106–124.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1316.62186
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/11-AOAS513
  Project Euclid: euclid.aoas/1331043390
  
• Rasmussen, J. G. (2013). Bayesian inference for Hawkes processes. Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab. 15 623–642.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1368.60055
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/s11009-011-9272-5
  
• Ratcliffe, J. H. and Rengert, G. F. (2008). Near-repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings. Secur. J. 21 58–76.
• Rathbun, S. L. (1996). Asymptotic properties of the maximum likelihood estimator for spatio-temporal point processes. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 51 55–74.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0881.62100
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/0378-3758(95)00070-4
  
• Ripley, B. D. (1977). Modelling spatial patterns. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 39 172–212.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 0369.60061
  
• Ross, G. J. (2016). Bayesian estimation of the ETAS model for earthquake occurrences. Preprint.
• Sarma, S. V., Nguyen, D. P., Czanner, G., Wirth, S., Wilson, M. A., Suzuki, W. and Brown, E. N. (2011). Computing confidence intervals for point process models. Neural Comput. 23 2731–2745.
• Schoenberg, F. P. (2003). Multidimensional residual analysis of point process models for earthquake occurrences. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 98 789–795.
• Schoenberg, F. P. (2013). Facilitated estimation of ETAS. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103 601–605.
• Schoenberg, F. P. (2016). A note on the consistent estimation of spatial-temporal point process parameters. Statist. Sinica 26 861–879.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1356.62164
  
• Schoenberg, F. P., Hoffman, M. and Harrigan, R. (2017). A recursive point process model for infectious diseases. Available at arXiv:1703.08202.
  arXiv: 1703.08202
  
• Short, M. B., D’Orsogna, M. R., Brantingham, P. J. and Tita, G. E. (2009). Measuring and modeling repeat and near-repeat burglary effects. J. Quant. Criminol. 25 325–339.
• Silverman, B. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL.
• Stan Development Team (2016). Stan modeling language users guide and reference manual. Available at http://mc-stan.org.
• Townsley, M., Homel, R. and Chaseling, J. (2003). Infectious burglaries: A test of the near repeat hypothesis. Br. J. Criminol. 43 615–633.
• Veen, A. and Schoenberg, F. P. (2008). Estimation of space–time branching process models in seismology using an EM-type algorithm. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 103 614–624.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 05564515
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1198/016214508000000148
  
• Vere-Jones, D. (2009). Some models and procedures for space–time point processes. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 16 173–195.
• Wang, Q., Schoenberg, F. P. and Jackson, D. D. (2010). Standard errors of parameter estimates in the ETAS model. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100 1989–2001.
• Weisburd, D. (2015). The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology 53 133–157.
• Zhuang, J. (2006). Second-order residual analysis of spatiotemporal point processes and applications in model evaluation. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 68 635–653.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1110.62128
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2006.00559.x
  
• Zhuang, J. (2011). Next-day earthquake forecasts for the Japan region generated by the ETAS model. Earth Planets Space 63 207–216.
• Zhuang, J., Ogata, Y. and Vere-Jones, D. (2002). Stochastic declustering of space–time earthquake occurrences. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 97 369–380.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 1073.62558
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1198/016214502760046925
  
• Zhuang, J., Ogata, Y. and Vere-Jones, D. (2004). Analyzing earthquake clustering features by using stochastic reconstruction. J. Geophys. Res. 109 B05301.
• Zipkin, J. R., Schoenberg, F. P., Coronges, K. and Bertozzi, A. L. (2016). Point-process models of social network interactions: Parameter estimation and missing data recovery. European J. Appl. Math. 27 502–529.
  Zentralblatt MATH: 06812563
  Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1017/S0956792515000492