- Statist. Sci.
- Volume 32, Number 3 (2017), 352-355.
Inference from Randomized (Factorial) Experiments
This is a contribution to the discussion of the interesting paper by Ding [Statist. Sci. 32 (2017) 331–345], which contrasts approaches attributed to Neyman and Fisher. I believe that Fisher’s usual assumption was unit-treatment additivity, rather than the “sharp null hypothesis” attributed to him. Fisher also developed the notion of interaction in factorial experiments. His explanation leads directly to the concept of marginality, which is essential for the interpretation of data from any factorial experiment.
Statist. Sci., Volume 32, Number 3 (2017), 352-355.
First available in Project Euclid: 1 September 2017
Permanent link to this document
Digital Object Identifier
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
Bailey, R. A. Inference from Randomized (Factorial) Experiments. Statist. Sci. 32 (2017), no. 3, 352--355. doi:10.1214/16-STS600. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ss/1504253119
- Main article: A Paradox from Randomization-Based Causal Inference.