Statistical Science

[That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Comment

Terry Speed

Full-text: Open access

Article information

Source
Statist. Sci., Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 42-44.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 19 April 2007

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ss/1177011930

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/ss/1177011930

JSTOR
links.jstor.org

Citation

Speed, Terry. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Comment. Statist. Sci. 6 (1991), no. 1, 42--44. doi:10.1214/ss/1177011930. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ss/1177011930


Export citation

See also

  • Original Paper: G. K. Robinson. That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects. Statist. Sci., Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 15--32.
  • See Comment: Katherine Campbell. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Comment. Statist. Sci., Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 32--34.
  • See Comment: David A. Harville. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Comment. Statist. Sci., Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 35--39.
  • See Comment: James C. Spall. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Comment: The Kalman Filter and BLUP. Statist. Sci., Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 39--41.
  • See Comment: Duane Steffey, Robert E. Kass. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Comment. Statist. Sci., Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 45--47.
  • See Comment: Robin Thompson. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Comment. Statist. Sci., Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 47--47.
  • See Comment: G. K. Robinson. [That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects]: Rejoinder. Statist. Sci., Volume 6, Number 1 (1991), 48--51.