Nagoya Mathematical Journal

Existence of extremal Beltrami coefficients with nonconstant modulus

Guowu Yao

Full-text: Open access

Abstract

Suppose that [μ]T(Δ) is a point of the universal Teichmüller space T(Δ). In 1998, Božin, Lakic, Marković, and Mateljević showed that there exists μ such that μ is uniquely extremal in [μ]T(Δ) and has a nonconstant modulus. It is a natural problem whether there is always an extremal Beltrami coefficient of constant modulus in [μ]T(Δ) if [μ]T(Δ) admits infinitely many extremal Beltrami coefficients; the purpose of this paper is to show that the answer is negative. An infinitesimal version is also obtained. Extremal sets of extremal Beltrami coefficients are considered, and an open problem is proposed. The key tool of our argument is Reich’s construction theorem.

Article information

Source
Nagoya Math. J., Volume 199 (2010), 1-14.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 14 September 2010

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.nmj/1284471568

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1215/00277630-2010-001

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR2730409

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1227.30021

Subjects
Primary: 30C75: Extremal problems for conformal and quasiconformal mappings, other methods
Secondary: 30C62: Quasiconformal mappings in the plane

Citation

Yao, Guowu. Existence of extremal Beltrami coefficients with nonconstant modulus. Nagoya Math. J. 199 (2010), 1--14. doi:10.1215/00277630-2010-001. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.nmj/1284471568


Export citation

References

  • [1] V. Božin, N. Lakic, V. Marković, and M. Mateljević, Unique extremality, J. Anal. Math. 75 (1998), 299–338.
  • [2] C. J. Earle and N. Lakic, Variability sets on Riemann surfaces and forgetful maps between Teichmüller spaces, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 27 (2002), 307–324.
  • [3] J. Fan and J. Chen, On the equivalence of extremal Teichmüller mapping, Sci. China Ser. A. 52 (2009), 77–86.
  • [4] V. Mateljević and V. Marković, The unique extremal QC mapping and uniqueness of Hanh-Banach extensions, Mat. Vesnik 48 (1996), 107–112.
  • [5] E. Reich, A criterion for unique extremality of Teichmüller mappings, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30 (1981), 441–447.
  • [6] E. Reich, The unique extremality counterexample, J. Anal. Math. 75 (1998), 339–347.
  • [7] E. Reich, Non-uniquely extremal quasiconformal mappings, Libertas Math. 20 (2000), 33–38.
  • [8] E. Reich and K. Strebel, “Extremal quasiconformal mappings with given boundary values” in Contributions to Analysis: A Collection of Papers Dedicated to Lipman Bers, Academic Press, New York, 1974, 375–391.
  • [9] K. Strebel, Point shift differentials and extremal quasiconformal mappings, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 23 (1998), 475–494.
  • [10] G. W. Yao, Is there always an extremal Teichmüller mapping? J. Anal. Math. 94 (2004), 363–375.
  • [11] G. W. Yao and Y. Qi, On the modulus of extremal Beltrami coefficients, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 46 (2006), 235–247.
  • [12] Z. Zhou, J. Chen, and Z. Yang, On the extremal sets of extremal quasiconformal mappings, Sci. China Ser. A 46 (2003), 552–561.