Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

Generic Expansions of Countable Models

Silvia Barbina and Domenico Zambella

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text


We compare two different notions of generic expansions of countable saturated structures. One kind of genericity is related to existential closure, and another is defined via topological properties and Baire category theory. The second type of genericity was first formulated by Truss for automorphisms. We work with a later generalization, due to Ivanov, to finite tuples of predicates and functions.

Let N be a countable saturated model of some complete theory T, and let (N,σ) denote an expansion of N to the signature L0 which is a model of some universal theory T0. We prove that when all existentially closed models of T0 have the same existential theory, (N,σ) is Truss generic if and only if (N,σ) is an e-atomic model. When T is ω-categorical and T0 has a model companion Tmc, the e-atomic models are simply the atomic models of Tmc.

Article information

Notre Dame J. Formal Logic Volume 53, Number 4 (2012), 511-523.

First available in Project Euclid: 8 November 2012

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

Zentralblatt MATH identifier

Primary: 03C10: Quantifier elimination, model completeness and related topics
Secondary: 20B27: Infinite automorphism groups [See also 12F10] 03C50: Models with special properties (saturated, rigid, etc.)

generic automorphism existentially closed structure comeager conjugacy class


Barbina, Silvia; Zambella, Domenico. Generic Expansions of Countable Models. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 53 (2012), no. 4, 511--523. doi:10.1215/00294527-1722728.

Export citation


  • [1] Baldwin, J. T., and S. Shelah, “Model companions of $T_{\mathrm{Aut}}$ for stable $T$,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 42 (2001), pp. 129–42.
  • [2] Barbina, S., and H. D. Macpherson, “Reconstruction of homogeneous relational structures,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 72 (2007), pp. 792–802.
  • [3] Chatzidakis, Z., and E. Hrushovski, “Model theory of difference fields,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 351 (1999), pp. 2997–3071.
  • [4] Chatzidakis Z., and A. Pillay, “Generic structures and simple theories,” Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 95 (1998), pp. 71–92.
  • [5] Hodges, W., Building Models by Games, vol. 2 of London Mathematical Society Student Texts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.
  • [6] Hodges, W., A Shorter Model Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
  • [7] Hodges, W., I. Hodkinson, D. Lascar, and S. Shelah, “The small index property for $\omega$-stable $\omega$-categorical structures and for the random graph,” Journal of the London Mathematical Society (2), vol. 48 (1993), pp. 204–18.
  • [8] Hrushovski, E., “Extending partial isomorphisms of graphs,” Combinatorica, vol. 12 (1992), pp. 411–16.
  • [9] Ivanov, A. A., “Generic expansions of $\omega$-categorical structures and semantics of generalized quantifiers,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 64 (1999), pp. 775–89.
  • [10] Kechris, A. S., and Ch. Rosendal, “Turbulence, amalgamation, and generic automorphisms of homogeneous structures,” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society (3), vol. 94 (2007), pp. 302–50.
  • [11] Kikyo, H., “Model companions of theories with an automorphism,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 65 (2000), pp. 1215–22.
  • [12] Kikyo, H., and S. Shelah, “The strict order property and generic automorphisms,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 67 (2002), pp. 214–16.
  • [13] Kudaibergenov, K. Zh., and H. D. Macpherson, “On model companions for structures with an automorphism,” Siberian Advances in Mathematics, vol. 16 (2006), pp. 63–78.
  • [14] Lascar, D., “Autour de la propriété du petit indice,” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society (3), vol. 62 (1991), pp. 25–53.
  • [15] Lascar, D., “Les beaux automorphismes,” Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 31 (1991), pp. 55–68.
  • [16] Macpherson, H. D., and S. Thomas, “Comeagre conjugacy classes and free products with amalgamation,” Discrete Mathematics, vol. 291 (2005), pp. 135–42.
  • [17] Marker, D., Model Theory: An Introduction, vol. 217 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, New York, 2002.
  • [18] Rubin, M., “On the reconstruction of $\aleph_{0}$-categorical structures from their automorphism groups,” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society (3), vol. 69 (1992), pp. 225–49.
  • [19] Truss, J. K., “Generic automorphisms of homogeneous structures,” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society (3), vol. 65 (1992), pp. 121–41.
  • [20] Truss, J. K., “On notions of genericity and mutual genericity,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 72 (2007), pp. 755–66.