Journal of Symbolic Logic

Δ03-determinacy, comprehension and induction

MedYahya Ould MedSalem and Kazuyuki Tanaka

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

We show that each of Δ13-CA0 + Σ13-IND and Π12-CA0 + Π13-TI proves Δ03-Det and that neither Σ31-IND nor Π13-TI can be dropped. We also show that neither Δ13-CA0 + Σ1-IND nor Π12-CA0 + Π1-TI proves Σ03-Det. Moreover, we prove that none of Δ21-CA0, Σ31-IND and Π21-TI is provable in Δ11-Det0 = ACA0 + Δ11-Det.

Article information

Source
J. Symbolic Logic, Volume 72, Issue 2 (2007), 452-462.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 30 July 2007

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jsl/1185803618

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.2178/jsl/1185803618

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR2320285

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1118.03056

Citation

MedSalem, MedYahya Ould; Tanaka, Kazuyuki. Δ 0 3 -determinacy, comprehension and induction. J. Symbolic Logic 72 (2007), no. 2, 452--462. doi:10.2178/jsl/1185803618. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jsl/1185803618


Export citation