Journal of Symbolic Logic

On constructing completions

Laura Crosilla, Hajime Ishihara, and Peter Schuster

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text


The Dedekind cuts in an ordered set form a set in the sense of constructive Zermelo—Fraenkel set theory. We deduce this statement from the principle of refinement, which we distill before from the axiom of fullness. Together with exponentiation, refinement is equivalent to fullness. None of the defining properties of an ordering is needed, and only refinement for two—element coverings is used.

In particular, the Dedekind reals form a set; whence we have also refined an earlier result by Aczel and Rathjen, who invoked the full form of fullness. To further generalise this, we look at Richman's method to complete an arbitrary metric space without sequences, which he designed to avoid countable choice. The completion of a separable metric space turns out to be a set even if the original space is a proper class; in particular, every complete separable metric space automatically is a set.

Article information

J. Symbolic Logic, Volume 70, Issue 3 (2005), 969-978.

First available in Project Euclid: 22 July 2005

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

Zentralblatt MATH identifier


Crosilla, Laura; Ishihara, Hajime; Schuster, Peter. On constructing completions. J. Symbolic Logic 70 (2005), no. 3, 969--978. doi:10.2178/jsl/1122038923.

Export citation


  • Peter Aczel Aspects of general topology in constructive set theory, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, to appear.
  • Peter Aczel and Chris Fox Separation properties in constructive topology, From Sets and Types to Topology and Analysis (L. Crosilla and P. Schuster, editors), Oxford University Press,2005, to appear.
  • Peter Aczel and Michael Rathjen Notes on constructive set theory,2000/01, Institut Mittag--Leffler preprint 40.
  • Errett Bishop Foundations of Constructive Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York,1967.
  • Errett Bishop and Douglas Bridges Constructive Analysis, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg,1985.
  • Giovanni Curi The points of (locally) compact regular formal topologies, Reuniting the Antipodes---Constructive and Nonstandard Views of the Continuum (Proceedings of the Symposion), 1999 (P. Schuster, U. Berger, and H. Osswald, editors), Synthese Library 306, Kluwer, Dordrecht,2001, pp. 39--54.
  • Robert Lubarsky Independence results around constructive ZF, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 132 (2005), pp. 209--225.
  • Per Martin-Löf An intuitionistic theory of types: Predicative part, Logic Colloquium '73 (H. E. Rose and J. C. Sheperdson, editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam,1975, pp. 73--118.
  • Per Martin-Löf An intuitionistic theory of types, Twenty-Five Years of Constructive Type Theory (G. Sambin and J. Smith, editors), Oxford University Press,1998, pp. 127--172.
  • John Myhill Constructive set theory, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 40 (1975), pp. 347--382.
  • Sara Negri and Daniele Soravia The continuum as a formal space, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 38 (1999), pp. 423--447.
  • Erik Palmgren Constructive completions of ordered sets, groups and fields, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic,(2005), to appear.
  • Fred Richman The fundamental theorem of algebra: A constructive development without choice, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 196 (2000), pp. 213--230.
  • Giovanni Sambin Some points in formal topology, Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 305 (2003), pp. 347--408.