Journal of Geometry and Symmetry in Physics

A Rigorous Framework for the Landau and Lifshitz Approach to Thomson Electrostatics

Michael Grinfeld and Pavel Grinfeld

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

Landau and Lifshitz [7] proposed a novel formulation of the famous Thomson theorem, also known as the Thomson variational principle. In an attempt to explain, rather than postulate, the distribution of electrical charge exclusively on the surface of the conductor, Landau and Lifshitz allow the admissible variations in the electrical charge to penetrate the interior of the conductor. This is a valuable generalization of their predecessors’ work, as well as a step towards basing more of the analysis on first principles.

Landau and Lifshitz’ approach has not received the attention it deserves because it was not formulated as a rigorous technique, but rather as a slight of hand to arrive at a known result. In this paper, we construct a rigorous mathematical framework based on the Landau and Lifshitz idea. In particular, we prove that surface distribution of charges corresponds to the absolute minimum of electrostatic energy.

Article information

Source
J. Geom. Symmetry Phys., Volume 41 (2016), 69-75.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 31 May 2017

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jgsp/1496196040

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.7546/jgsp-41-2016-69-75

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR3585166

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1359.35187

Citation

Grinfeld, Michael; Grinfeld, Pavel. A Rigorous Framework for the Landau and Lifshitz Approach to Thomson Electrostatics. J. Geom. Symmetry Phys. 41 (2016), 69--75. doi:10.7546/jgsp-41-2016-69-75. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jgsp/1496196040


Export citation