Journal of Generalized Lie Theory and Applications

The ABCs of the Mathematical Infinitology. Principles of the Modern Theory and Practice of Scientific-and-Mathematical Infinitology

EV Karpushkin

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

The modern Science has now a lot of its branches and meanders, where are working the numerous specialists and outstanding scientists everywhere in the whole world. The theme of this article is devoted to mathematics in general and to such a new subsidiary science as the Cartesian infinitology (± ∞: x y and x y z) in a whole.

The young and adult modern people of our time, among them, in first turn, are such ones as the usual citizens, students or schoolchildren, have a very poor imagination about those achievements and successes that made by our scientists in the different parts and divisions of many fundamental sciences, especially in mathematics. This article is a short description of the numerous ideas of a new science that is named by its inventor as the mathematical infinitology.

The infinity as the scientific category is a very complicated conception and the difficult theme for professional discussing of its properties and features even by the academicians and the Nobelists as well. In spite of all problems, the author have found his own road to this Science and worked out independently, even not being a mathematician at all, the universal, from his point of view, and unusual theories and scientific methods, which helped him to find and name It as the mathematical infinitology, that may be now studied in rectangular system of Cartesian or other coordinates, in orthogonal ones, for example, as easy and practically as we study the organic chemistry or Chinese language at the middle school or in the University.

The mathematical infinitology, as a separate or independent science, has been never existed in the mathematics from the ancient times up to the 90-th years of the XX-th century. All outstanding mathematicians of the past times were able only approximately to image to themselves and explain to their colleagues and pupils in addition, what is an infinity indeed: the scientific abstraction or the natural mathematical science that can be not only tested by one’s tooth or touched by hands, but study and investigate it in schools or the Institutions of higher learning too.

The article author without no one imagination, what it is indeed. Very long time working hours spent by the inventor with this mathematical toy or the simplest logical entertainment helped him to penetrate into the mysteries of this usual intellectual mathematical object and see in it the fantastic perspectives and possibilities as for science as for himself in further studying and it investigating. In a result of the own purposefulness and interests to the re-invented mathematical idea of the famous American mathematician S.M.Ulam, the new science was born in the World, and after long time experiments, it was named as the mathematical or Cartesian infinitology (±∞ : x y and x y z).

Article information

Source
J. Gen. Lie Theory Appl., Volume 10, Number S2 (2016), 14 pages.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 16 November 2016

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jglta/1479265230

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.4172/1736-4337.1000S2-011

Keywords
Cartesian infinitology Mathematical plus-minus infinity (±∞:xy and хyz) Cartesian coordinates Natural prime and twins numbers Theory of blank spaces Sieve of Erathosthenes Ulam’s spiral

Citation

Karpushkin , EV. The ABCs of the Mathematical Infinitology. Principles of the Modern Theory and Practice of Scientific-and-Mathematical Infinitology. J. Gen. Lie Theory Appl. 10 (2016), no. S2, 14 pages. doi:10.4172/1736-4337.1000S2-011. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jglta/1479265230


Export citation