## Journal of Applied Probability

### Generalized Efron's biased coin design and its theoretical properties

Yanqing Hu

#### Abstract

In clinical trials with two treatment arms, Efron's biased coin design, Efron (1971), sequentially assigns a patient to the underrepresented arm with probability $p\gt\frac{1}{2}$. Under this design the proportion of patients in any arm converges to $\frac{1}{2}$, and the convergence rate is $n^{-1}$, as opposed to $n^{-1/2}$ under some other popular designs. The generalization of Efron's design to $K\geq2$ arms and an unequal target allocation ratio $(q_1, \ldots, q_K)$ can be found in some papers, most of which determine the allocation probabilities $p$s in a heuristic way. Nonetheless, it has been noted that by using inappropriate $p$s, the proportion of patients in the $K$ arms never converges to the target ratio. We develop a general theory to answer the question of what allocation probabilities ensure that the realized proportions under a generalized design still converge to the target ratio $(q_1, \ldots, q_K)$ with rate $n^{-1}$.

#### Article information

Source
J. Appl. Probab., Volume 53, Number 2 (2016), 327-340.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 17 June 2016

https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jap/1466172857

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR3514281

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1343.60035

Subjects
Primary: 60F99: None of the above, but in this section
Secondary: 62P10: Applications to biology and medical sciences

#### Citation

Hu, Yanqing. Generalized Efron's biased coin design and its theoretical properties. J. Appl. Probab. 53 (2016), no. 2, 327--340. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jap/1466172857

#### References

• Atkinson, A. C. (1982). Optimum biased coin designs for sequential clinical trials with prognostic factors. Biometrika 69, 61–67.
• Baldi Antognini, A. and Giovagnoli, A. (2004). A new `biased coin design' for the sequential allocation of two treatments. J. R. Statist. Soc. C 53, 651–664.
• Burman, C. F. (1996). On sequential treatment allocations in clinical trials. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Mathematics, Chalmers University of Technology.
• Chen, Y.-P. (1999). Biased coin design with imbalance tolerance. Commun. Statist. Stoch. Models 15, 953–975.
• Efron, B. (1971). Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced. Biometrika 58, 403–417.
• Eisele, J. R. and Woodroofe, M. B. (1995). Central limit theorems for doubly adaptive biased coin designs. Ann. Statist. 23, 234–254.
• Han, B., Enas, N. and McEntegart, D. (2009). Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation. Statist. Med. 28, 3329–3346.
• Han, B., Yu, M. and McEntegart, D. (2013). Weighted re-randomization tests for minimization with unbalanced allocation. Pharm. Statist. 12, 243–253.
• Hu, F. and Rosenberger, W. F. (2006). The Theory of Response-Adaptive Randomization in Clinical Trials. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
• Hu, F. and Zhang, L.-X. (2004). Asymptotic properties of doubly adaptive biased coin designs for multitreatment clinical trials. Ann. Statist. 32, 268–301.
• Hu, F., Zhang, L.-X. and He, X. (2009). Efficient randomized-adaptive designs. Ann. Statist. 37, 2543–2560.
• Hu, F., Hu, Y., Ma, Z. and Rosenberger, W. F. (2014). Adaptive randomization for balancing over covariates. WIREs Comput. Statist. 6, 288–303.
• Hu, F. \et (2015). Statistical inference of adaptive randomized clinical trials for personalized medicine. Clin. Investigation 5, 415–425.
• Hu, J., Zhu, H. and Hu, F. (2015). A unified family of covariate-adjusted response-adaptive designs based on efficiency and ethics. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 110, 357–367.
• Hu, Y. and Hu, F. (2012). Asymptotic properties of covariate-adaptive randomization. Ann. Statist. 40, 1794–1815.
• Kuznetsova, O. M. and Tymofyeyev, Y. (2012). Preserving the allocation ratio at every allocation with biased coin randomization and minimization in studies with unequal allocation. Statist. Med. 31, 701–723.
• Kuznetsova, O. M. and Tymofyeyev, Y. (2013). Shift in re-randomization distribution with conditional randomization test. Pharm. Statist. 12, 82–91.
• Ma, W., Hu, F. and Zhang, L. (2015). Testing hypotheses of covariate-adaptive randomized clinical trials. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 110, 669–680.
• Markaryan, T. and Rosenberger, W. F. (2010). Exact properties of Efron's biased coin randomization procedure. Ann. Statist. 38, 1546–1567.
• Meyn, S. P. and Tweedie, R. L. (1993). Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability. Springer, London.
• Pocock, S. J. and Simon, R. (1975). Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics 31, 103–115.
• Proschan, M., Brittain, E. and Kammerman, L. (2011). Minimize the use of minimization with unequal allocation. Biometrics 67, 1135–1141.
• Rosenberger, W. F. and Lachin, J. M. (2002). Randomization in Clinical Trials: Theory and Practice. John Wiley, New York.
• Rosenberger, W. F., Sverdlov, O. and Hu, F. (2012). Adaptive randomization for clinical trials. J. Biopharm. Statist. 22, 719–736.
• Smith, R. L. (1984). Properties of biased coin designs in sequential clinical trials. Ann. Statist. 12, 1018–1034.
• Smith, R. L. (1984). Sequential treatment allocation using biased coin designs. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 46, 519–543.
• Soares, J. F. and Wu, C.-F. J. (1983). Some restricted randomization rules in sequential designs. Commun. Statist. Theory Meth. 12, 2017–2034.
• Wei, L. J. (1978). An application of an urn model to the design of sequential controlled clinical trials. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 73, 559–563.
• Wei, L. J. (1978). The adaptive biased coin design for sequential experiments. Ann. Statist. 6, 92–100.
• Wei, L. J., Smythe, R. T. and Smith, R. L. (1986). $K$-treatment comparisons with restricted randomization rules in clinical trials. Ann. Statist. 14, 265–274.
• Zhang, L.-X., Hu, F., Cheung, S. H. and Chan, W. S. (2007). Asymptotic properties of covariate-adjusted response-adaptive designs. Ann. Statist. 35, 1166–1182.