Journal of Applied Mathematics

  • J. Appl. Math.
  • Volume 2012, Special Issue (2012), Article ID 809243, 17 pages.

Adaptive Fault Detection for Complex Dynamic Processes Based on JIT Updated Data Set

Jinna Li, Yuan Li, Haibin Yu, Yanhong Xie, and Cheng Zhang

Full-text: Open access

Abstract

A novel fault detection technique is proposed to explicitly account for the nonlinear, dynamic, and multimodal problems existed in the practical and complex dynamic processes. Just-in-time (JIT) detection method and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) rule-based statistical process control (SPC) approach are integrated to construct a flexible and adaptive detection scheme for the control process with nonlinear, dynamic, and multimodal cases. Mahalanobis distance, representing the correlation among samples, is used to simplify and update the raw data set, which is the first merit in this paper. Based on it, the control limit is computed in terms of both KNN rule and SPC method, such that we can identify whether the current data is normal or not by online approach. Noted that the control limit obtained changes with updating database such that an adaptive fault detection technique that can effectively eliminate the impact of data drift and shift on the performance of detection process is obtained, which is the second merit in this paper. The efficiency of the developed method is demonstrated by the numerical examples and an industrial case.

Article information

Source
J. Appl. Math., Volume 2012, Special Issue (2012), Article ID 809243, 17 pages.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 3 January 2013

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jam/1357180105

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1155/2012/809243

Citation

Li, Jinna; Li, Yuan; Yu, Haibin; Xie, Yanhong; Zhang, Cheng. Adaptive Fault Detection for Complex Dynamic Processes Based on JIT Updated Data Set. J. Appl. Math. 2012, Special Issue (2012), Article ID 809243, 17 pages. doi:10.1155/2012/809243. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jam/1357180105


Export citation

References

  • M. Wang and T. Zhan, “Analysis of the fault attack ECDLP over prime field,” Journal of Applied Mathe-matics, vol. 2011, Article ID 580749, 11 pages, 2011.
  • Z. Gao, T. Breikin, and H. Wang, “Reliable observer-based control against sensor failures for systems with time delays in both state and input,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics A, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1018–1029, 2008.
  • Z. Gao, X. Shi, and S. X. Ding, “Fuzzy state/disturbance observer design for T-S fuzzy systems with application to sensor fault estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics B, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 875–880, 2008.
  • Z. Gao, X. Dai, T. Breikin, and H. Wang, “Novel parameter identification by using a high-gain observer with application to a gas turbine engine,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 271–279, 2008.
  • X. B. Yang, X. Q. Jin, Z. M. Du, and Y. H. Zhu, “A novel model-based fault detection method for temperature sensor using fractal correlation dimension,” Building and Environment, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 970–979, 2011.
  • L. F. Mendonça, J. M. C. Sousa, and J. M. G. Sá da Costa, “An architecture for fault detection and isolation based on fuzzy methods,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 1092–1104, 2009.
  • P. M. Frank, E. Alcorta García, and B. Köppen-Seliger, “Modelling for fault detection and isolation versus modelling for control,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 53, no. 4–6, pp. 259–271, 2000.
  • F. Li, B. R. Upadhyaya, and L. A. Coffey, “Model-based monitoring and fault diagnosis of fossil power plant process units using group method of data handling,” ISA Transactions, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 213–219, 2009.
  • Q. P. He and J. Wang, “Fault detection using the k-nearest neighbor rule for semiconductor manu-facturing processes,” IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 345–354, 2007.
  • Q. P. He and J. Wang, “Principal component based k-nearest-neighbor rule for semiconductor process fault detection,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference (ACC '08), pp. 1606–1611, Washington, USA, June 2008.
  • J. Park, I. H. Kwon, S. S. Kim, and J. G. Baek, “Spline regression based feature extraction for semi-conductor process fault detection using support vector machine,” Expert Systems with Applica-tions, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 5711–5718, 2011.
  • K. Manabu, S. Takeaki, and H. Shinji, “Just-in-time statistical process control for flexible fault management,” in Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference, pp. 1482–1485, Taipei, Taiwan, August 2010.
  • Z. Gao and H. Wang, “Descriptor observer approaches for multivariable systems with measurement noises and application in fault detection and diagnosis,” Systems and Control Letters, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 304–313, 2006.
  • Z. Gao, S. X. Ding, and Y. Ma, “Robust fault estimation approach and its application in vehicle lateral dynamic systems,” Optimal Control Applications and Methods, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 143–156, 2007.
  • C. C. Feng, “Robust fault-tolerant control for systems with extended bounded-sensor-faults,” in Proceedings of the 17th World Congress of the International Federation of Automatic Control, pp. 2582–2587, Seoul, Korea, 2008.
  • D. M. Himmelblau, Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Chemical and Petrochemical Processes, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherland, 1978.
  • S. Simani and C. Fantuzzi, “Dynamic system identification and model-based fault diagnosis of an industrial gas turbine prototype,” Mechatronics, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 341–363, 2006.
  • Z. Ge and Z. Song, “Online monitoring of nonlinear multiple mode processes based on adaptive local model approach,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1427–1437, 2008.
  • C. Cheng and M. S. Chiu, “Nonlinear process monitoring using JITL-PCA,” Chemometrics and Intel-ligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2005.
  • S. Yoon and J. F. MacGregor, “Statistical and causal model-based approaches to fault detection and isolation,” AIChE Journal, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1813–1824, 2000.
  • V. Venkatasubramanian, R. Rengaswamy, K. Yin, and S. N. Kavuri, “A review of process fault detec-tion and diagnosis: part I: quantitative model-based methods,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 293–311, 2003.
  • S. Mahadevan and S. L. Shah, “Fault detection and diagnosis in process data using one-class support vector machines,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1627–1639, 2009.
  • D. Fischer, Artificial Intelligence Techniques Applied to Fault Detection Systems [Ph.D. Dissertation], Elec-trical and Computer Engineering, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada, 2004.
  • D. Dong and T. J. Mcavoy, “Nonlinear principal component analysis–-based on principal curves and neural networks,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 65–78, 1996.
  • H. G. Hiden, M. J. Willis, M. T. Tham, and G. A. Montague, “Non-linear principal components ana-lysis using genetic programming,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 413–425, 1999.
  • W. Ku, R. H. Storer, and C. Georgakis, “Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 179–196, 1995.
  • G. Bontempi, H. Bersini, and M. Birattari, “The local paradigm for modeling and control: from neuro-fuzzy to lazy learning,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 59–72, 2001.
  • R. D. Nowak, “Nonlinear system identification,” Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 109–122, 2002.
  • X. Gao, G. Wang, and J. H. Ma, “An approach of building simplified multivariate statistical model based on mahalanobis distance,” Information and Control, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 676–680, 2001.
  • A. Ison and C. J. Spanos, “Robust fault detection and fault classification of semiconductor manu-facturing equipment,” in Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing, pp. 1–4, Tokyo, Japan, October 1996.
  • W. Li, H. H. Yue, S. Valle-Cervantes, and S. J. Qin, “Recursive PCA for adaptive process monitoring,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 471–486, 2000.
  • B. M. Wise, N. B. Gallagher, S. W. Butler, D. D. White, and G. G. Barna, “A comparison of principal component analysis, multiway principal component analysis, trilinear decomposition and parallel factor analysis for fault detection in a semiconductor etch process,” Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 13, no. 3-4, pp. 379–396, 1999.
  • E. R. Inc, “Metal etch data for fault detection evaluation,” 1999, http://software.eigenvector.com/ Data/Etch/index.html.