International Statistical Review

Developing Official Stochastic Population Forecasts at the US Census Bureau

John F. Long and Frederick W. Hollmann

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text

Abstract

The U.S. Census Bureau is approaching a critical decision regarding a major facet of its methodology for forecasting the United States population. In the past, it has relied on alternative scenarios, low, medium, and high, to reflect varying interpretations of current trends in fertility, mortality, and international migration to forecast population. This approach has limitations that have been noted in the recent literature on population forecasting. Census Bureau researchers are embarking on an attempt to incorporate probabilistic reasoning to forecast prediction intervals around point forecasts to future dates. The current literature offers a choice of approaches to this problem. We are opting to employ formal time series modeling of parameters of fertility, mortality, and international migration, with stochastic renewal processes. The endeavor is complicated by the administrative necessity to produce a large amount of racial and Hispanic origin detail in the population, as well as the ubiquitous cross-categories of age and sex. As official population forecasts must meet user demand, we are faced with the added challenge of presenting and supporting the resulting product in a way that is comprehensible to users, many of whom have little or no comprehension of the technical forecasting literature, and are accustomed to simple, deterministic answers. We may well find a need to modify our strategy, depending on the realities that may emerge from the limitations of data, the administrative requirements of the product, and the diverse needs of our user community.

Article information

Source
Internat. Statist. Rev., Volume 72, Number 2 (2004), 201-208.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 3 August 2004

Permanent link to this document
https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.isr/1091543055

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1330.62436

Keywords
Stochastic forecasting Racial disaggregation Hispanic origin Composition effects User demand

Citation

Long, John F.; Hollmann, Frederick W. Developing Official Stochastic Population Forecasts at the US Census Bureau. Internat. Statist. Rev. 72 (2004), no. 2, 201--208. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.isr/1091543055


Export citation

References

  • [1] Ahlburg, D.A. and Lutz, W. (1998). Introduction: The Need to Rethink Approaches to Population Forecasts. In Frontiers of Population Forecasting. Supplement to Population and Development Review, 24, 1-14, Eds. W. Lutz, J.W. Vaupel and D.A. Ahlburg.
  • [2] Keyfitz, N. (1981). The limits of population forecasting. Population and Development Review, 7(4), 579-593.
  • [3] Kohler, H.P. and Ortega, A. (2001). Period Parity Progression Measures with Continued Fertility Postponement: A New Look at the Implications of Delayed Childbearing for Cohort Fertility. Max Planck Institut für Demografische Forschung, Working Paper No. 2001-001 (January).
  • [4] Lee, R.D. and Carter, L.R. (1992). Modeling and forecasting U.S. mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association 87(419), 659-675.
  • [5] Lee, R. and Tuljapurkar, S. (1994). Stochastic population forecasts for the United States: Beyond high, medium, and low. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(428), 1175-1189. Abstract can also be found in the ISI/STMA publication
  • [6] Lee, R.D. (1998). Probabilistic approaches to population forecasting. Population and Development Review, 24 (supplement), 156-190.
  • [7] Long, J.F. (1984). U.S. national population projection methods: A view from four forecasting traditions. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 3, 231-239.
  • [8] Long, J.F. (1989). The relative effects of fertility, mortality, and immigration on projected population age structure. In Future Demographic Trends in Europe and North America, Ed. W. Lutz. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
  • [9] Lutz, W., Sanderson, W.C. and Scherbov, S. (1998). Expert-based probabilistic population projections. Population and Development Review, supplement, 24, 139-155.
  • [10] Lutz, W., Vaupel, J.W. and Ahlburg, D.A. (Eds.) (1998). Frontiers of Population Forecasting. Supplement to Population and Development Review, 24.
  • [11] Stoto, M. (1983). The accuracy of population projections. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 13-20.
  • [12] U.S. Bureau of the Census (1988). Projections of the Population of the United States by Age, Sex, and Race: 1983 to 2080. Current Population Reports, Series P-25, No. 1018.